Tag: drone restrictions

  • FAA restricts drones over more DOJ and DOD facilities

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued additional drone flight restrictions over U.S. federal prisons, military bases and Pearl Harbor, effective Feb. 26.

    At the request of its federal security partners, the FAA is using its existing authority under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 99.7 — “Special Security Instructions” — to address concerns about drone operations over national security sensitive facilities by establishing temporary unmanned aircraft system (UAS) specific flight restrictions.

    This is in addition to previous restrictions over prisons, NGA facilities, DoD ships and other facilities.

    Information on the FAA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), which defines these restrictions, and all of the currently covered locations, can be found at the FAA’s UAS Data Display System, which provides an interactive map, downloadable geospatial data, and other important details.

    A link to the restrictions is also included in the FAA’s B4UFLY mobile app.

    Additional, broader information regarding flying drones in the National Airspace System, including frequently asked questions, is available on the FAA’s UAS website.

    In cooperation with Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Defense (DOD), the FAA is establishing additional restrictions on drone flights up to 400 feet within the lateral boundaries of the following federal facilities:

    Federal Correctional Institution Allenwood Medium in Allenwood, PA
    Federal Correctional Institution Beaumont Medium in Beaumont, TX
    Federal Correctional Institution Butner Medium I in Butner, NC
    Federal Correctional Institution Butner Medium II in Butner, NC
    Federal Correctional Institution Coleman Medium near Sumterville, FL
    Federal Correctional Institution Florence in Florence, CO
    Federal Correctional Institution Forrest City Medium in Forrest City, AR
    Federal Correctional Institution Hazelton near Bruceton Mills, WV
    Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc in Lompoc, CA
    Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale I in Oakdale, LA
    Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale II in Oakdale, LA
    Federal Correctional Institution Petersburg near Hopewell, VA
    Federal Correctional Institution Pollock in Pollock, LA
    Federal Correctional Institution Terre Haute in Terre Haute, IN
    Federal Correctional Institution Tucson in Tucson, AZ
    Federal Correctional Institution Victorville Medium I in Victorville, CA
    Federal Correctional Institution Victorville Medium II in Victorville, CA
    Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Medium in Yazoo City, MS
    Federal Detention Center Honolulu in Honolulu, HI
    Federal Detention Center Houston in Houston, TX
    Federal Detention Center Miami in Miami, FL
    Federal Detention Center Philadelphia in Philadelphia, PA
    Federal Detention Center SeaTac near Seattle, WA
    Federal Medical Center Carswell near Fort Worth, TX
    Federal Medical Center Fort Worth in Fort Worth, TX
    Federal Medical Center Rochester in Rochester, MN
    Metropolitan Correctional Center Chicago in Chicago, IL
    Metropolitan Correctional Center New York in New York City, NY
    Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego in San Diego, CA
    Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield in Springfield, MO
    Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn in Brooklyn, NY
    Metropolitan Detention Center Guaynabo in Guaynabo, PR
    Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles in Los Angeles, CA
    Fort Detrick in Frederick, MD
    Fort Gordon near Augusta, GA
    Fort Lee near Richmond, VA
    Holston Army Ammunition Plant near Kingsport, TN
    McAlester Army Ammunition Plant in McAlester, OK
    Radford Army Ammunition Plant in Radford, VA
    Joint Base McGuire near Trenton, NJ
    Pearl Harbor Naval Defense Sea Area in Honolulu, HI

    These changes, which have been highlighted by FAA NOTAM FDC [9/2586], are pending until they become effective on Feb. 26. Note that there are only a few exceptions that permit drone flights within these restrictions, and they must be coordinated with the individual facility or the FAA.

    Operators who violate the flight restrictions may be subject to enforcement action, including potential civil penalties and criminal charges.

    The FAA is continuing to consider additional requests by eligible federal security agencies for UAS-specific flight restrictions using the agency’s § 99.7 authority as they are received. Additional changes to these restrictions will be announced by the FAA as appropriate.

  • FAA restricts drones near DOD and USCG ships, subs

    FAA restricts drones near DOD and USCG ships, subs

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued more drone flight restrictions — this time, near U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard vessels operating in the vicinity of Naval Base Kitsap, Washington, and Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia.

    Drone operations are required to maintain a distance of at least 3,000 feet laterally and 1,000 feet vertically from the ships and submarines.

    The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Nebraska returns to Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor following sea trials. (Photo: U.S. Navy/Lt.Cmdr. Michael Smith, Commander, Submarine Group Nine)
    The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS Nebraska returns to Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor following sea trials. (Photo: U.S. Navy/Lt.Cmdr. Michael Smith, Commander, Submarine Group Nine)

    At the request of the Department of Defense (DOD) and the United States Coast Guard (USCG), the FAA is using its existing authority under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations § 99.7 — “Special Security Instructions” — to address concerns about potentially malicious drone operations over certain, high-priority maritime operations.

    The special security instructions, provided in an FAA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), are now in effect. Additional information on these special security instructions includes a visual depiction and geospatial definition of the relevant airspace.

    The FAA also warns drone operators that the USN and USCG vessels are authorized by law to take protective action against drones perceived to be safety or security threats, which could result in seizure, damage or destruction of the drones.

    Operators who don’t comply may face civil penalties and criminal charges.

    Any operator with an overriding reason of public interest or necessity (such as conducting a search-and-rescue mission) to operate their drone in close proximity to the cited USN and USCG vessels must first coordinate with the USN or USCG point of contact.

    In a separate Special Notice Advisory NOTAM, also effective today, the FAA strongly advises drone operators to remain clear of DOD and Department of Energy (DOE) facilities and mobile assets, as well as USCG vessels.

    The notice applies nationwide and alerts operators who ignore this caution and conduct drone flights perceived to be a safety or security threat to these facilities and mobile assets could face a reaction by security forces that results in the interference, disruption, seizure, damage or destruction of their drone.

    Information can be found here on these two NOTAMs, and all of the locations currently covered by § 99.7 restrictions. This website also provides an interactive map, downloadable geospatial data, and other important details. Additional information, including frequently asked questions, is available on the FAA’s UAS website.

  • PrecisionHawk joins with DJI to refine airport geofencing

    PrecisionHawk joins with DJI to refine airport geofencing

    New risk-based “bow-tie” zones will help protect aircraft using PrecisionHawk’s Low Altitude Traffic and Airspace Safety (LATAS) platform.

    DJI is improving its geofencing technology to refine the airspace limitations for drone flights near airports, providing smarter protection for airplanes in critical areas.

    DJI has updated Geospatial Environment Online (GEO) Version 2.0, and will phase it in starting in November when the revised zones will take effect for airspace around airports in the United States. Upgrades in other regions will follow.

    Image: DJI
    Image: DJI

    The new system allows GEO to create detailed three-dimensional “bow-tie” safety zones surrounding runway flight paths, and to use complex polygon shapes around other sensitive facilities, rather than simple circles.

    The new restrictions better reflect the actual safety risk posed in those areas, while allowing more flights to the side of runways where risk is substantially lower.

    Runway exclusion zones. DJI’s new geofencing also incorporates the principles of Section 384 of the recently enacted U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Act designating the final approach corridor to active runways at major airports to be “runway exclusion zones” for unauthorized drones. DJI customers should update their DJI GO 4 flight control app and aircraft firmware to ensure these improvements are implemented.

    To obtain reliable geospatial information for the enhanced shapes in GEO 2.0, DJI has chosen a new data provider that can provide highly accurate details such as the exact locations of airport runways and facility boundaries.

    PrecisionHawk’s LATAS. In North America, DJI will use data from PrecisionHawk Inc., replacing DJI’s previous geospatial data provider AirMap. Under a partnership agreement, PrecisionHawk’s Low Altitude Traffic and Airspace Safety (LATAS) platform will provide DJI customers with critical airspace information that will position them to fly safely in North America.

    DJI will be able to refine airspace limitations for drone flights near airports, providing smarter protection for drones in critical areas and clarifying restrictions, PrecisionHawk said.

    “PrecisionHawk has a corporate commitment to safely integrating drones into the airspace and enabling complex operations,” said Diana Cooper, senior vice president of policy and strategy at PrecisionHawk. “Through our work under the FAA Pathfinder Program, we have shown how technology can play a critical role in unlocking advanced operations, including beyond visual line of sight flight.”

    GEO 2.0 Development. DJI first created No-Fly Zones for its drones in 2013 and introduced the more refined GEO system three years later, adding live updates and new zones for prisons and nuclear power plants, while providing flexible self-unlocking for professionals.

    Both systems recognized that the overwhelming majority of drone pilots want to fly safely and responsibly, and want an easy-to-use guide to help them understand the airspace so they can do so.

    Image: PixOArtist's rendering of a no-drone sign near an airport. Image: PixOne/Shutterstock.comne/Shutterstock.com
    Artist’s rendering of a no-drone sign near an airport. Image: PixOne/Shutterstock.com

    To develop GEO 2.0, DJI collaborated with general aviation pilots through the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and with airports through the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) to incorporate their expertise and guidance about air traffic and airports into DJI’s new geofencing methods.

    DJI geofencing uses GPS and other navigational satellite signals to automatically help prevent drones from flying near sensitive locations such as airports, prisons, nuclear power plants and high-profile events.

    In certain locations, a DJI drone cannot take off or fly in a geofenced area without special authorization. Drone pilots with verified DJI accounts can unlock some areas if they have legitimate reasons and necessary approvals, but the most critical areas require special action from DJI to unlock them.

    DJI has streamlined the approval process so professional drone pilots with authorization to fly in sensitive locations can receive unlocking codes within 30 minutes.

    The GEO System. The GEO system previously geofenced a 5-mile circle around airports, with enhanced restrictions in a smaller circle encompassing the airport area.

    GEO 2.0 applies the strongest restrictions to a 1.2 kilometer- (3/4 mile)-wide rectangle around each runway and the flight paths at either end, where airplanes actually ascend and descend. Less strict restrictions apply to an oval area within 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) of each runway.

    This bow-tie shape opens more areas on the sides of runways to beneficial drone uses, as well as low-altitude areas more than 3 kilometers (1.9 miles) from the end of a runway, while increasing protection in the locations where traditional aircraft actually fly.

    Artist's concept of a drone approaching a commercial airliner. Image: PixOne/Shutterstock.com
    Artist’s concept of a drone approaching a commercial airliner. Image: PixOne/Shutterstock.com

    Aviation Parameters. DJI’s new boundary areas around airport runways are based on the International Civil Aviation Organization’s Annex 14 standard for airspace safety near runways and the FAA’s Part 77 parameters for “imaginary surfaces” and air navigation obstructions.

    DJI’s categorization of airports is based on traffic volume principles defined in statutes such as U.S. Title 49 section 47102, and the FAA’s criteria developed in 2012 for categorizing general aviation airports.

    Using these aviation parameters, DJI has aligned its geofencing safety feature to broader understandings of airspace and airport risk. This chart demonstrates how GEO 2.0 applies those detailed, risk-based airspace boundaries to the airspace around airports that can be considered to involve relative high, medium, and low risk (see graphic).

    LATAS. Through its work under the FAA Pathfinder Program, PrecisionHawk has shown how technology such as LATAS can play a critical role in unlocking advanced operations, including beyond visual line of sight flight. LATAS was tested under the Pathfinder Program to facilitate safe beyond visual line of sight operations.

    LATAS brings a combined set of geospatial and software tools to the market. In addition to providing improved geospatial data, the LATAS platform features specialized display elements, including telemetry and access to the Harris real-time manned aircraft feed. Using these elements pilots can easily observe the relative altitude and horizontal separation of intruding aircraft and other mission-critical measures.

  • FAA restricts drone operations over NGA facilities

    FAA restricts drone operations over NGA facilities

    Photo: FAA
    Photo: iStock.com/NiseriN via the Federal Aviation Administration

    In cooperation with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is establishing restrictions on drone flights up to 400 feet within the lateral boundaries of National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) facilities.

    The temporary flight restrictions — specific to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) — apply to three NGA facilities in or near St. Louis:

    • National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) West
    • NGA Next West
    • NGA Arnold

    In June, the FAA responded to federal agency requests and restricted drone operations over penitentiaries and Coast Guard bases.

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is using its existing authority under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations § 99.7 — “Special Security Instructions” — to address concerns about drone operations over national security-sensitive facilities.

    The changes, which are highlighted by FAA NOTAM FDC 8/7350, are pending until they become effective on Aug. 30.

    Only a few exceptions permit drone flights within these restrictions, and they must be coordinated with the individual facility and/or the FAA.

    Operators who violate the flight restrictions may be subject to enforcement action, including potential civil penalties and criminal charges.

    To ensure the public is aware of restricted locations, the FAA website also provides an interactive map, downloadable geospatial data and other important details. The restrictions also are depicted in the FAA’s B4UFLY mobile app. Broader information regarding flying drones in the National Airspace System, including frequently asked questions, is available on the FAA’s UAS website.

    The FAA continues to consider additional requests by eligible federal security agencies for UAS-specific flight restrictions using the agency’s § 99.7 authority as they are received. Additional changes to these restrictions will be announced by the FAA as appropriate.

  • FAA restricts drones over federal prisons, Coast Guard bases

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established temporary unmanned aircraft system (UAS) flight restrictions over federal penitentiaries and U.S. Coast Guard bases.

    The restrictions, which take place June 20, are for drone flights up to 400 feet within the lateral boundaries of the facilities.

    The restrictions came at the request of federal security partners the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

    The FAA is using its existing authority under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 99.7 — “Special Security Instructions” — to address concerns about drone operations over these facilities,” the agency stated.

    Information on the FAA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), which defines these restrictions, and the covered locations, can be found on the FAA’s UAS website. Broader information regarding flying drones in the National Airspace System, including frequently asked questions, is also on the FAA website.

    An interactive map, downloadable geospatial data and other important details can be found here.

    A link to the restrictions is also included in the FAA’s B4UFLY mobile app.

    This is the first time the FAA has placed specific flight restrictions for unmanned aircraft over Federal Bureau of Prisons and Coast Guard facilities. The FAA has placed similar flight restrictions over military installations that remain in place, as well as over 10 Department of Interior facilities and seven Department of Energy facilities.

    Operators who violate the flight restrictions may be subject to enforcement action, including potential civil penalties and criminal charges.

    There are a few exceptions that permit drone flights, which must be coordinated with the individual facility or the FAA.

    The FAA is considering additional requests by eligible federal security agencies for UAS-specific flight restrictions using the agency’s §99.7 authority as they are received. Additional changes to these restrictions will be announced by the FAA as appropriate.

    The following facilities will have the new restrictions:

    United States Penitentiaries (USP)

    USP Tucson near Tucson, AZ
    USP Atwater near Atwater, CA
    USP Victorville near Victorville, CA
    USP Florence High near Florence, CO
    USP Florence ADMAX near Florence, CO
    USP Coleman I near Sumterville, FL
    USP Coleman II near Sumterville, FL
    USP Marion near Marion, IL
    USP Terre Haute near Terre Haute, IN
    USP Big Sandy near Inez, KY
    USP McCreary near Pine Knot, KY
    USP Pollock near Pollock, LA
    USP Yazoo City near Yazoo City, MS
    USP Allenwood near Allenwood, PA
    USP Canaan near Waymart, PA
    USP Lewisburg near Lewisburg, PA
    USP Beaumont near Beaumont, TX
    USP Lee near Pennington Gap, VA
    USP Hazelton near Bruceton Mills, WV

    United States Coast Guard (USCG) Bases

    USCG Baltimore Yard, MD
    USCG Base Boston, MA
    USCG Base Alameda, CA
    USCG Base Los Angeles/Long Beach (LALB), CA
    USCG Base Elizabeth City, NC
    USCG Base Kodiak, AK
    USCG Base Miami, FL
    USCG Base Portsmouth, VA
    USCG Base Seattle, WA
    USCG Operations System Center (OSC) near Martinsburg, WV