Tag: satellite constellation

  • NGA awards HawkEye 360 contract for RF mapping

    NGA awards HawkEye 360 contract for RF mapping

    Up to five-year contract follows a successful pilot program that demonstrated the value of commercial RF geospatial intelligence

    HawkEye360 logoHawkEye 360 has been awarded a contract by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) to help the agency discover, characterize and map activities that emit energy in the radio frequency (RF) bands of the electromagnetic spectrum.

    HawkEye 360 specializes in RF data and analytics from space-based satellites.

    HawkEye 360 will provide NGA the means to develop global datasets, enabling users to discover and monitor a broad range of RF activity across large geographic areas.

    The $10 million one-year contract includes an option for four more years. It will support users throughout the NGA enterprise, including the combatant commands and other mission partners.

    HawkEye 360’s data will support a variety of analytics missions for NGA, including military activity and the trafficking of military, nefarious, non-state and transnational criminal (or illicit) activity. The company’s growing constellation of satellites will provide insight into developing events in a timely manner, and the company will work collaboratively with NGA on an ongoing basis to effectively meet the agency’s mission needs.

    “We’re pleased to be moving from the pilot into an NGA long-term operational contract, which showcases the value of unclassified, shareable commercial RF insights,” said HawkEye 360 CEO John Serafini.

    “This program is an excellent example of agile acquisition rapidly delivering high-impact GEOINT to the warfighter,” said Alex Fox, the company’s executive vice president for business development, sales and marketing.

    NGA leveraged a National Reconnaissance Office commercial integration study contract with HawkEye 360 in September 2020 to execute a test and evaluation contract with the company.

    NGA then issued a competitive RFP in March 2021 and awarded the contract in July 2021. “We are excited to continue working with NGA to address current mission requirements and expand the RF GEOINT tradecraft to address an even larger set of mission requirements, much like NGA has done with their pioneering use of commercial imagery,” Fox said.

    HawkEye 360 operates a constellation of nine RF-monitoring satellites. Twenty-one additional satellites are fully funded and scheduled for launch in 2021 and 2022. Once complete, this baseline constellation of 30 satellites will provide collection revisits as frequently as every 20 minutes.

    Following the establishment of the baseline constellation, HawkEye 360 plans to launch a second-generation constellation of 30 additional satellites by 2025 to satisfy projected capacity and operational requirements.

    The company’s RF data and analytics produce actionable insights for national, tactical and homeland security operations, maritime domain awareness, environmental protection and a growing number of new defense and commercial applications.

  • Video celebrates 10 years of Galileo

    Video celebrates 10 years of Galileo

    A new video celebrates the first decade of Europe’s satellite navigation system Galileo, which celebrates its 10-year anniversary on Oct. 21.

    Galileo delivers meter-level accuracy anywhere on Earth. It is also saving lives, by relaying distress calls for search and rescue. Today, 26 Galileo satellites orbit 23,222 km above the Earth. The first was launched on Oct. 21, 2011; nine more launches followed to create the constellation.

    The satellites in space are supported by a globe-spanning ground segment. The system as a whole is set to grow, with the first dozen Batch 3 about to join the current satellites in orbit and Galileo Second Generation satellites in development.

    Galileo is financed by the European Union and developed by the European Space Agency. Services are delivered by the EU Agency for the Space Programme.

    Illustration: Thales Alenia Space
    Illustration: Thales Alenia Space
  • Innovation: QZS-3 and QZS-4 join the Quasi-Zenith Satellite System

    Innovation: QZS-3 and QZS-4 join the Quasi-Zenith Satellite System

    Constellation completed

    By Peter Steigenberger, Steffen Thoelert, André Hauschild, Oliver Montenbruck and Richard B. Langley

    INNOVATION INSIGHTS with Richard Langley

    POP QUIZ: What is the most populous metropolitan area in the world? According to Wikipedia, it is Tokyo. In fact, Japan has three cities in the list of the 50 largest cities in the world. Not only are there a lot of people in these cities, they also have many tall and densely packed buildings. And that’s a problem for GPS and the other global navigation satellite systems.

    Radio signals travel in straight lines. Well, mostly so. At very low frequencies, radio waves propagate as ground waves and can achieve long-distance propagation in the waveguide formed by the surface of the Earth and the ionosphere. At slightly higher frequencies, such as those used by AM radio, signals still travel as ground waves. However, additionally, the signals propagate upwards as skywaves. During daylight hours, the D layer of the ionosphere absorbs the skywaves, but when the D layer dissipates at night, the higher ionospheric levels can reflect skywaves back to Earth allowing long-distance reception. And communication by shortwave is virtually all by ionosphere-bounce skywaves. Above 30 MHz or so, signals normally travel along line-of-sight raypaths. The atmosphere can slightly bend the raypath, but the signals essentially travel in straight lines. Of course, that’s what makes GPS possible.

    GPS works exceedingly well as long as a receiver’s antenna has a line-of-sight “view” of the satellites. Obstacles such as mountains and buildings block the relatively weak GPS signals. In concrete canyons, for example, that may leave a receiver with fewer than four satellites in view, meaning that 3D positioning is impossible. Even if four or more satellites are visible, they may be bunched together in the sky, resulting in high dilution of precision values and potentially large position errors.

    In an effort to alleviate the GPS positioning problem in both urban and mountainous areas of Japan, the Japanese government has developed the Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS). A constellation of three inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) satellites and one geostationary satellite transmits GPS-compatible signals to enhance positioning availability and accuracy. The IGSO satellites have repeating figure-eight ground tracks with the satellites spending most of their one-sidereal-day orbit, centered around apogee, over the Japanese archipelago. The satellites sequentially hover in the sky near the zenith for long periods of time. The satellites also provide both standard and advanced augmentation signals.

    The first, or prototype, Block I QZSS satellite was launched in 2010 and, based on the positive test results from this satellite, an additional three satellites were launched in 2017, completing a four-satellite constellation. In this month’s column, we examine the recent developments of this unique and innovative navigation system.


    With the launch of two additional spacecraft in August and October 2017, the Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) reached the goal of a four-satellite constellation with the first fully-operational services expected to start in 2018. Aug. 19, 2017, marked the launch of QZS-3, the first geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) QZSS satellite, while the third spacecraft in inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO), QZS-4, was subsequently launched on Oct. 10, 2017. An artist’s view of the constellation is shown in FIGURE 1.

    FIGURE 1. An artist’s view of the QZSS satellites. The upper-most satellite is the geostationary QZS-3 spacecraft with the additional S-band dish antenna whereas the other satellites pictured are the inclined geosynchronous satellites. (Image: Mitsubishi Electric)

    Table 1 lists the four satellites of the current QZSS constellation. Whereas the first generation Block I satellite QZS-1 was launched in 2010, the three Block II satellites joined the constellation in 2017.

    Table 1. QZSS constellation as of December 2017. SVN: space vehicle number, PRN: pseudorandom noise (code number), IGSO: inclined geosynchronous orbit, GEO: geostationary Earth orbit.

    The most obvious visual difference between the QZSS Block I and II satellites is the different number of subpanels for the solar arrays: three for the Block I satellite and two for the Block II satellites with spanned widths of 25.3 meters and 19.0 meters, respectively. The reduced size of the Block II array has been achieved through the use of new, high-efficiency solar cells. The GEO satellite in addition carries S- and Ku-band antennas with diameters of 3.2 meters and 1.0 meter, respectively. While the IGSO satellites are equipped with a helix antenna array for transmission of the main L-band navigation signals, the GEO satellite uses a patch antenna array similar to that of the Galileo satellites.

    The ground tracks of the four QZSS satellites are plotted in FIGURE 2. The ground tracks of all of the IGSO satellites have the characteristic figure-eight shape due to the large orbit eccentricity of 0.075 and results in a longer visibility period for users in the northern hemisphere. The ground tracks do not precisely match, however. QZS-1 and QZS-4 have similar orbit inclinations (with respect to the equator) of 40.9° and 40.5°. QZS-2, on the other hand, has a larger inclination of 44.5°, which leads to a wider extension of the ground track in the north-south direction.

    FIGURE 2. Ground tracks of the four-satellite QZSS constellation as of Dec. 4, 2017. The blue square indicates the sub-satellite point of the geostationary QZS-3 satellite.  (Image: Authors)
    FIGURE 2. Ground tracks of the four-satellite QZSS constellation as of Dec. 4, 2017. The blue square indicates the sub-satellite point of the geostationary QZS-3 satellite. (Image: Authors)

    Also, the central longitude of the ground tracks, which marks the center of the figure-eight shape, varies between 130° and 140° E. These differences are still within the tolerances defined in the QZSS Interface Specification, version 1.8 of Oct. 3, 2016, which specifies the inclination to be 43° ± 4° and the central longitude of the ground track to be 135° ± 5° E. The GEO satellite QZS-3 is located at 127° E and has been controlled to stay within a 0.1° inclination window since achieving its initial orbit.

    All QZSS satellites transmit navigation signals in the L1, L2 and L5 bands compatible with GPS, namely L1 C/A, L1C, L2C and L5 (the Positioning, Navigation and Timing or PNT service). QZSS-specific signals are transmitted in the L1, L5 and L6 bands: the Sub-meter Level Augmentation Service or SLAS (formerly, Submeter-class Augmentation with Integrity Function or SAIF) signals for all satellites on L1 and, in addition, on L5 for Block II satellites (see TABLE 2).

    Table 2. QZSS signals. The L2C and CLAS signals use interleaved bit streams for concurrent transmission of two independent ranging sequences. The L1S signal consists of SLAS, a message service, and L1Sb, an SBAS signal. (Based on Table 11.2 in the Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems).

    Starting in 2020, the GEO satellite will also provide a satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) signal called L1Sb with range corrections and integrity information for aviation applications in particular. The SLAS and SBAS signals are transmitted via dedicated antennas but they are phase coherent with the GPS-compatible navigation signals transmitted via the main L-band antenna. The L6 signal provides the Centimeter Level Augmentation Service or CLAS (formerly, the L-band Experiment or LEX) on all QZSS satellites, but employs a different signal structure for Block I (L61) and Block II (L62). An overview of the various L-band signals and corresponding PRN assignments is given in TABLE 3. QZS-3 also provides the QZSS Safety Confirmation Service (Q-ANPI) to support rescue operations with S-band communication in case of a disaster. The total transmit power is 500 watts for the Block II IGSO satellites and 550 watts for the GEO satellite.

    Table 3. PRN code assignment of QZSS satellites according to the interface specifications (see Further Reading). RINEX: PRN code in RINEX observation files; NAV: PRN code for L1 C/A, L1C, L2C and L5 navigation signals; NSTD: non-standard codes of IGSO/GEO satellites.

    QZS-3/4 SIGNAL TRANSMISSION

    Tracking of the QZS-3 L1 C/A and L5 signals by receivers in the German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt or DLR) and International GNSS Service networks started on Sept. 10, 2017, at 09:04 UTC followed by the L1C and L2C signals at 09:27 UTC. L5 tracking started with a very low carrier-to-noise-density ratio (C/N0) of 10 – 20 dB-Hz that increased to 50 – 55 dB-Hz shortly after the activation of the L1C and L2C signals. QZS-3 broadcast ephemerides were first transmitted on Oct. 4, 2017, at 16:00 UTC. However, tracking of the L1, L2 and L5 navigation signals with common geodetic receivers is currently limited to receivers with experimental firmware versions developed by three different manufacturers.

    Signal transmissions from QZS-4 started on Nov. 1, 2017. The first L1 C/A signals of PRN J03 were received at 02:50 UTC. At the same time, L5 signal transmission started but this signal was only tracked by a very limited number of receivers due to its low signal strength resulting in a C/N0 of only about 15 dB-Hz. At 03:14 UTC, an increase of the C/N0 by about 40 dB occurred and many additional receivers started tracking the L5 signal. At the same time, the L1C and L2C signals were also activated followed by the L1 SLAS signal at 03:20 UTC.

    It is interesting to note that QZS-4 also transmitted the non-standard code J06 on different frequencies during its first weeks of operation. This code cannot be used for positioning and is used for test purposes or in case of system errors. Until Nov. 27, 2017, QZS-4 regularly switched between transmission of standard and non-standard codes. An example of such a switch for the station UNX200AUS located in Sydney, Australia, is shown in FIGURE 3. During this test period, several outages of individual or all navigation signals also occurred. Since Nov. 24, 2017, 5:00 UTC, broadcast ephemerides of QZS-4 have been available and transmission of the L5 SLAS signal started at 09:31 UTC.

    FIGURE 3. QZS-4 signals tracked by DLR’s JAVAD Delta-3TH receiver in Sydney, Australia. The top plot shows the standard code PRN J03 and the bottom plot the non-standard code J06. The measured C/N0 is shown for L1 C/A (black), L1C (blue), L2C (red) and L5 (green).  (Image: Authors)
    FIGURE 3. QZS-4 signals tracked by DLR’s JAVAD Delta-3TH receiver in Sydney, Australia. The top plot shows the standard code PRN J03 and the bottom plot the non-standard code J06. The measured C/N0 is shown for L1 C/A (black), L1C (blue), L2C (red) and L5 (green). (Image: Authors)

    FIGURE 4 shows the L-band normalized power spectra of QZS-2 and QZS-4. The spectra were obtained from in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) data recorded with DLR’s 30-meter high-gain antenna in Weilheim, Germany. Almost identical characteristics can be seen for the signals of both satellites in the L1, L2 and L6 bands. However, in the L5 band, QZS-4 shows a slightly lower power than that of QZS-2 due to the lack of the L5 SLAS transmission during the data recording. Unfortunately, QZS-3 is not visible from Weilheim due to a longitude difference of more than 115°.

    FIGURE 4. Normalized power spectra of QZS-2 and QZS-4 measured with DLR’s 30-meter high-gain antenna on July 18, 2017, and Nov. 7, 2017, respectively.  (Image: Authors)
    FIGURE 4. Normalized power spectra of QZS-2 and QZS-4 measured with DLR’s 30-meter high-gain antenna on July 18, 2017, and Nov. 7, 2017, respectively. (Image: Authors)

    ATTITUDE

    Usually, QZS-2 and QZS-4 follow a nominal yaw steering attitude with the spacecraft z-axis pointing towards the Earth and the y-axis (solar panel axis) oriented perpendicular to the plane defined by the locations of the satellite, the Sun, and the Earth. The maximum yaw rate of these satellites is limited to 0.055° per second and can be exceeded by the nominal yaw rate when the angle of the Sun with respect to the orbital plane (the beta angle, β) is between -5° and +5°. During orbit control maneuvers, the QZSS Block II IGSO satellites are operated in orbit normal mode with the z-axis pointing to the Earth and the y-axis perpendicular to the orbital plane. The geostationary QZS-3 satellite is continuously operated in orbit normal model while QZS-1 enters orbit normal mode for |β| < 20°.

    Detailed information about the different attitude rules as well as spacecraft reference frame, mass, center of mass, phase center offsets and variations of the navigation antenna, laser retroreflector offsets, satellite group delays as well as the total transmit power of all four satellites is provided by the Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, in the QZSS satellite information documents.

    Since all QZSS satellites are equipped with a separate L1 SLAS transmit antenna, which is mounted with an offset to the main L-band antenna, each satellite’s attitude can be directly estimated from single-difference carrier-phase observations between the two spacecraft antennas.

    FIGURE 5 illustrates the attitude of QZS-4 estimated from L1 C/A and L1 SLAS observations from 10 tracking stations as well as the nominal yaw steering attitude. QZS-4 had a beta angle of about 11° on Dec. 9, 2017, confirming that this satellite does not enter orbit normal mode for |β| < 20° as does QZS-1. Differences between nominal yaw steering attitude and estimated attitude are usually within ±1.5° reflecting estimation errors as well as differences between nominal and true attitude.

    FIGURE 5. Nominal yaw steering attitude (blue) and estimated attitude (red) of QZS-4 for Dec. 9, 2017 (β ≈ 11°).  (Image: Authors)
    FIGURE 5. Nominal yaw steering attitude (blue) and estimated attitude (red) of QZS-4 for Dec. 9, 2017 (β ≈ 11°). (Image: Authors)

    CLOCK PERFORMANCE

    The clock stability represented by the modified Allan deviation is given in the upper panel of FIGURE 6 for the QZSS IGSO satellites. The QZSS Block II IGSO satellites show an almost identical stability for integration periods up to 100 seconds. For longer periods, the QZS-2 clock seems to perform slightly better.

    However, this effect is probably related to the number of stations contributing to the clock solutions of the individual satellites which differs by a factor of more than two. For comparison purposes, the Allan deviation of two Galileo rubidium clocks (GAL-101 and GAL-204) and a Galileo passive hydrogen maser (PHM, GAL-207) are plotted in the bottom panel of Figure 6.

    Whereas the performance of the QZSS and Galileo rubidium clocks is very similar, the Galileo PHM is more stable by a factor of two to five over all integration periods.

    FIGURE 6. Modified Allan deviations of the QZSS IGSO rubidium clocks, Galileo rubidium clocks (GAL-101 and GAL-204) and a Galileo passive hydrogen maser (GAL-207). (Image: Authors)
    FIGURE 6. Modified Allan deviations of the QZSS IGSO rubidium clocks, Galileo rubidium clocks (GAL-101 and GAL-204) and a Galileo passive hydrogen maser (GAL-207). (Image: Authors)

    CONCLUSIONS

    With the launch of the third IGSO spacecraft and the first GEO spacecraft, the QZSS constellation has reached a four-satellite configuration, which is required for the provision of operational augmentation services. QZS-3 and QZS-4 were declared useable for PNT, SLAS, and CLAS trial services on Dec. 18, 2017, and Jan. 12, 2018, respectively. Inclusion in the operational QZSS constellation is expected for 2018 and this will provide continuous visibility of three satellites in the service area. An expansion to a constellation of seven satellites is planned for 2023 including a Public Regulated Service for authorized users.

    MANUFACTURERS

    Data used in this article was collected using Javad GNSS Delta-G3TH, Trimble NetR9 and Septentrio PolaRx4 and PolaRx5 receivers.


    Authors Peter Steigenberger, Steffen Thoelert, André Hauschild and Oliver Montenbruck are from the German Aerospace Center (DLR).

    Richard B. Langley is from the University of New Brunswick and authors the monthly “Innovation” column for GPS World magazine.

    FURTHER READING

    • Quasi-Zenith Satellite System

    “Quasi-Zenith Satellite System” part of “Regional Systems” by S. Kogure, A.S. Ganeshan and O. Montenbruck, Chapter 11 in Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by P.J.G. Teunissen and O. Montenbruck, published by Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017.

    • Interface Specifications

    Quasi-Zenith Satellite System Interface Specification: Satellite Positioning, Navigation and Timing Service (IS-QZSS-PNT-001), Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Tokyo, March 28, 2017.

    Quasi-Zenith Satellite System Interface Specification: Sub-meter Level Augmentation Service
    (IS-QZSS-L1S-001), Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Tokyo, March 28, 2017.

    Quasi-Zenith Satellite System Interface Specification: Centimeter Level Augmentation Service
    (IS-QZSS-L6-001), Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Tokyo, Sept. 15, 2017.

    • Previous QZSS Signal Analysis

    QZS-2 Signal Analysis, QZS-3 Launched” by S. Thoelert, A. Hauschild, P. Steigenberger, O. Montenbruck and R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 28, No. 9, September 2017, pp. 10–14.

    • DLR’s 30-meter High-Gain Antenna in Weilheim

    GPS L5 First Light: A Preliminary Analysis of SVN49’s Demonstration Signal” by M. Meurer, S. Erker, S. Thölert, O. Montenbruck, A. Hauschild and R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 20, No. 6, June 2009, pp. 49-58.

  • Directions 2018: BeiDou builds, diversifies, expands

    Directions 2018: BeiDou builds, diversifies, expands

    By Changfeng Yang,
    Chief Architect of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

    Changfeng Yang

    As one of the four major GNSS providers, the establishment of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) has been steadily developed, following a three-step strategy. By around 2020, BDS will form a nominal space constellation consisting of 30 satellites, including three satellites in geostationary Earth orbit (GEO), three satellites in inclined geosynchronous satellite orbit (IGSO) and 24 satellites in medium Earth orbit (MEO). It will provide global users with open and high-quality services free of charge, including navigation, positioning, timing, short message communication, search and rescue and so on.

    BDS is aimed at developing into a world-class global navigation satellite system, with innovative and advanced technologies, extraordinary user experience, international development and worldwide presence, which can provide fundamental time and space reference for national defense and economic-social development, and advance the progress of high-tech and IT industries.

    BDS has initiated several innovative attempts in the fields of both international satellite navigation and domestic aerospace for the first time, and paved a unique development path of a satellite navigation system, with an eye on the state conditions and distinctive features. On Jan. 9, 2017, the BD-2 Project won the top National Scientific and Technological Progress Award. In 2017, BDS achieved fruitful results in the aspects of system construction, integrated applications and international development.

    System Construction

    Through upgrading and reconstructing the ground system, the service performance, stability and availability of the BD-2 constellation have been improved. To achieve user-oriented services, the updated Interface Control Document (ICD) for B1C and B2a open service signals (Version 2.1) was released in accordance with the constellation change.

    The international GNSS Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS) has been built, consisting of eight domestic monitoring stations and 16 overseas stations, to monitor and assess the service performances of BDS, GPS, GLONASS and Galileo at real-time worldwide. It has taken all factors into consideration, including constellation status, signal-in-space, navigation message, service performance and high-precision products, and so on. According to its analysis results, the nominal positioning accuracy of the BD-2 system in the coverage area has been optimized from 10 meters to 8 meters.

    Development of the BD-3 System. On Nov. 5, the first pair of the 24 BD-3 MEO satellites were successfully launched, while another pair is planned to be launched by the end of the year.

    Liftoff of the first pair of the BD-3 MEO satellites on Nov. 5, 2017. (Credit: Xinhua)

    The BD-3 satellites are equipped with B1C and B2a signals with optimized performance, which are compatible and interoperable with other GNSS signals. The interface control document of B1C and B2a signals (beta version) was released in September. The BD-3 satellites also adopt the higher-performance rubidium atomic clock with stability of E-14 and hydrogen atomic clock with stability of E-15. By utilizing new technologies, the signal-in-space (SIS) accuracy will be superior to 0.5 m; the position accuracy will be doubled or quadrupled, and reach 2.5 m to 5 m.

    The BD-3 system will retain the short message communication service of its predecessors, and further enhance basic positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) service capabilities. Satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) and search-and-rescue (SAR) services will be added and developed according to international standards.

    After in-orbit tests and networking validation, the BD-3 satellites will be able to provide operational services, and accelerate the global coverage of BDS.

    Ground-Based Augmentation. The Phase I construction of the BDS/GNSS ground-based augmentation system has been completed, consisting of 150 framework reference stations, 1,200 reference stations of higher density network, national data processing center, six industrial data-processing centers, and manufacturing of user terminals. This system has achieved basic service capabilities, and its service performance standard (version 1.0) has been released. Through integration with the internet, a cloud platform has been established to provide high-precision space-time information services, including real-time navigation services at meter-level and decimeter-level, as well as precise positioning services at centimeter-level and millimeter-level.

    Satellite-Based Augmentation. Based on the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, system demonstration and validation work on the BeiDou Satellite-Based Augmentation System (BDSBAS) has been completed, and the technical status of the system has been confirmed in accordance of the next-generation SBAS Dual Frequency Multiple Constellation (DFMC) standards.

    Integrated Applications

    Currently, a great number of independent, self-controlled intellectual property rights on the fundamental BDS products have been achieved. World-class, advanced technologies have been developed. With the release of the first Chinese in-house developed meter-level fast positioning BDS chip, BDS applications have begun to embrace the era of meter-level positioning.

    In 2017, the sales volume of BDS navigation chips and modules exceeded 50 million pieces, and that of high-precision surveying boards and navigation antenna captured 30% and 90% of market shares respectively. There are more than 14,000 enterprises (including more than 50 publicly listed companies), and more than 450,000 employees in China engaging in BDS-related business.

    The annual output value of the publicly listed company in 2017 is more than RMB 50 billion (US $7.53 billion). The number of terminals produced by domestic enterprises surpasses 40 million pieces/sets. BDS has gained recognition from mainstream chip producers such as Qualcomm, Trimble, Hemisphere GNSS, Huawei, Samsung, u-blox, MTK, Broadcom, NovAtel and more, and the total number of terminals is estimated to surpass 300 million pieces or sets.

    BDS continues to:

    • promote integrated applications and development of related industries;
    • bring GNSS high-precision services in combination with cloud computing, Internet of Things, big data and other technologies;
    • push forward the integration between BDS-related industries and high-end manufacturing, software, and integrated data industries.

    BDS has been applied in the transportation, logistics, emergency rescue, marine fishing and other fields, which has greatly improved production efficiency, reduced resource consumption, and lowered pollution. For example, benefiting from the BDS applications in traffic management industry, the number of major accidents has decreased by 46.7%, and the death toll has been reduced by 48.9%. With BDS-based maritime applications, more than 10,000 lives have been saved.

    BDS/GNSS augmentation services have been applied to precision agriculture, land mapping, monitoring on deformation and displacement of large-scale public facilities, and earthquake and geological hazard measurement and survey; the latter has provided important monitoring for public safety. As a result, the production of precision agriculture has increased by 5%, and the oil consumption by agricultural machinery has decreased by 10%. The time for surveying and mapping of national land is shortened from a few days to several seconds.

    BDS has been fully put into mass applications. BDS-based navigation services have been adopted by various enterprises, such as Huawei, ZTE, Baidu, Autonavi, Alibaba, JD and others in the fields of manufacturing of mobile and smart terminals, location-based services (LBS), e-commerce, and so on. BDS-based LBS have been widely applied in the mass consumption sector and people’s livelihood, and many innovative applications have emerged, such as caring for seniors and children, shared vehicles, BDS-based logistics, and so on, which have been changing people’s lives and providing more convenience for the public.

    International Development

    At present, BDS has covered more than 50 countries and more than 3 billion people. BDS-related products have gained access to the markets of more than 70 countries and regions, more than 30 of which are along the (land-based) Belt and (maritime) Road (in line with the Belt and Road Initiative). Through joint applications with other compatible navigation satellite systems, BDS provides global users with diversified choices for better application experience.

    Meanwhile, the iGMAS has contributed to the implementation of the Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization project, iGMAS-International GNSS Service Pilot experimental project, and Sino-Russian monitoring and assessment cooperation, and has provided GNSS users with authentic third-party assessment results. China continuously pushes forward BDS to be recognized by the ICAO, International Maritime Organization (IMO), mobile communication standard Partnership Project and other organizations, to serve the world in line with international conventions.

    In October, three PRN codes which are essential to the development of BDSBAS were assigned; the SBAS service provider identifier and UTC standard identifier have been assigned to BDSBAS by ICAO, which marks BDSBAS an official SBAS provider in the ICAO family, and lays the foundation for the follow-up construction of BDSBAS, as well as its provision of standard navigation services for the civil aviation sector.

    In March, a multi-system (including GPS, BDS and GLONASS) ship-borne receiver standard was approved by the IMO. BDS has also been included in the PNT guidelines of maritime applications.

    In the field of mobile communication, 26 technical standards that support the BDS positioning function have been adopted by the third- and fourth-generation mobile communication standard Partnership Projects.

    Future Plans

    BDS will keep improving its continuous stability and service accuracy. Two more BD-2 replacement satellites will be launched in 2018, ensuring its regional service performance will be remain stable and be enhanced.

    Eighteen BD-3 MEO satellites and one BD-3 GEO satellite will be launched by around the end of 2018. Upon the deployment of those 19 satellites, BD-3 will possess the initial operational capability and serve the countries along the Belt and Road. The official version of ICD for B1C and B2a open service signals, as well as other system documents, will be released, in line with the operational status of BD-3 satellites, for the convenience of public applications.

    In regard to augmentation systems, China plans to complete the construction of Phase II BDS/GNSS ground-based augmentation system in 2018, and advance the recognition of BDS-based high-precision services as public goods. In 2018, the first BDSBAS GEO satellite with the BDSBAS payload will be launched to start the deployment of the BDSBAS system.

    In terms of applications and international development, China will give full play to the role of BDS in the integration procedure between industrialization and IT applications, to promote the development of information industry, adjustment and upgrading of industrial structure.

    China will also strengthen the cooperation and communication with other navigation satellite system providers, carry out coordination under the framework of international organizations and multilateral platforms, improve the international development of BDS, provide better services for users along the Belt and Road, and expand BDS services to serve users worldwide.

  • Directions 2018: Galileo ascendant

    Directions 2018: Galileo ascendant

    By Paul Verhoef
    Director of the Galileo Programme and Navigation-related Activities,
    European Space Agency

    Paul Verhoef, director of the Galileo Programme addresses the audience at ESA's annual Navigation Days, held Jan. 26. (Photo: ESA)
    Paul Verhoef, director of the Galileo Programme. (Photo: ESA)

    The European Space Agency (ESA) and the European GNSS Agency (GSA) are starting 2018 with the commissioning and In-Orbit Testing (IOT) of four new Galileo satellites.

    This work is fairly routine for us as we have achieved the process successfully many times. But the impact of four new satellites for Galileo services is a different story.

    This batch of satellites provided by OHB of Germany — 19, 20, 21 and 22  — will bring our constellation to 22 satellites. Together with the necessary ground segment delivered by Thales Alenia Space (TAS) and Airbus Defense and Space (ADS) and their many subcontractors throughout Europe, this will be providing availability to users anywhere in the world in order to achieve a high-quality position solution 99.8% of the time. “High quality” is hereby meant that the position dilution of precision (PDOP) will be smaller than 5, with our final accuracy for a full 24 FOC satellites operating at full potential being PDOP ~ 2.4.

    This achievement will create a step change in the ability of service providers and equipment manufacturers to utilize the Galileo service. For all intents and purposes, it means the Galileo signal can always be relied upon to be there, and industry can sell products and design the power budget of devices based upon that fact.

    Dual Frequency. The first mass-market GNSS receiver chip for smartphones and mobile devices that is able to utilize dual-frequency Galileo signals was released by Broadcom in September, able to employ both L1/E1 and L5/E5 signals. In 2018, dual-frequency technology like this will provide an order of magnitude increase in the performance of mobile device location-based services (LBS), especially in urban environments, and Broadcom advertises a 50% reduction in power consumption. The world of mobile-device LBS is going to change in 2018, and it will be due to the availability of Galileo.

    It will not be the first time the partnership of ESA, the European Commission (EC) and the GSA has made a service available that has changed the nature of the marketplace. The GSA already has in service the ESA-designed EGNOS LPV200 aircraft approach service performing so well that countries like France have taken the decision to phase out the terrestrial Instrument Landing System that has burdened the capital expenditure budgets of airports in the past.

    We have had discussions with several commercial organizations that are interested in building products around Galileo, and I am excited to see what they are going to come up with. With Galileo Initial Services the world had a new navigation signal to study and trial. In 2018 the world will have a new star to navigate by — well, a new constellation of 22 to 24 stars, I should say!

    FOC. In the summer of 2018 we will launch the final part of the Galileo FOC constellation (geometrically speaking) with four more satellites taking us beyond the 24 needed for 100% coverage and minimum performance limitation from satellite geometry. The launch will also provide our first in-orbit spares, enabling us to plan for the end of life of our old validation phase satellites or otherwise supplement the constellation to improve performance.

    What might we do with these in-orbit spares? Our first priority is to complete a constellation of 24 satellites in the correct orbits for minimum PDOP; as you know, a Fregat upper-stage malfunction left GSAT 0201 and 0202 in orbits too elliptical to correct fully, so the current plan is to complete the 24-satellite geometry. 0201 and 0202 are foreseen to be fully integrated in the Galileo operational system in 2018 following further testing and preparations, allowing us to have a 24+2 constellation with “hot back-up” from 0201 and 0202 contributing at around current GPS satellite levels of accuracy.


    “It will not be the first — nor the last — time the partnership of ESA, the EC and the GSA has made a service available that has changed the nature of the marketplace.”


    Of course, as is known to the community, the validation-phase satellite GSAT 0104 is down to single frequency, and we routinely monitor the health of all satellites. 0104 is the only satellite that has lost part of its function; designed-in redundancy has managed all other problems.

    However, obviously we will be examining all options for deployment to ensure that the Galileo schedule is not impacted by in-orbit failures, and those we have experienced we have learned from and mitigated successfully without impacting the service.

    The first two spares are not the end of our ability to maintain the constellation and our system performance. All four validation phase satellites will need to be replaced, and so the “Batch 3” satellite procurement will continue to regularly roll out satellites for replenishment of the constellation.

    Enhancements. That won’t mean we will be resting on our laurels. In 2018 we also plan to release enhancements to the ground segment for Galileo, a process that will be a first as the system is already being operated by the GSA.

    The process of managing an in-service upgrade program with the GSA is going to be new and challenging, but we have a strong engineering support team deployed as part of our working arrangement with the GSA to help ensure the process goes smoothly.

    Of course, the need for GSA to be able to continue smooth operations imposes extra discipline and imposes on us a balance between stable operations and continued build-out of the infrastructure. We do not consider this to be a problem; on the contrary, the focus will be on robust operations and availability to the user.

    Back at base (ESTEC in the Netherlands for Galileo and Toulouse, France, for EGNOS) we are full steam ahead on preparing the future. We are moving forward at considerable pace with our next-generation designs that develop new functionality for continuous service improvements.

    Free PPP. Galileo was designed to broadcast a Commercial Service signal providing services such as precise point positioning to paying customers, but we are pleased to able to report that the EC has confirmed that this service will be provided for free by the European Union. In 2018/2019 the GSA will select the providers and get that unique, free service on the air.

    In 2017 the EC confirmed the decision to implement the commercial service using E6-B with both encrypted and open components so all users could benefit for all frequency bands. Now, with the decision to make the service available free of charge, all users of Galileo, with the right type of receiver, will be able to achieve position fixes with an accuracy around 10 cm from Galileo’s first-generation constellation by 2020/2021.

    The Galileo Public Regulated Service will also be a focus, with the EC soon to decide upon release dates for the first milestones on the service roadmap. The infrastructure and equipment to support a secure service is being put in place, and I can’t say more for security!

    The next generation of European GNSS technology will include multi-constellation EGNOS, Galileo 2nd Generation (G2G) and a transition batch of satellites between the first and second generations to get the best technology proven in flight and working for Galileo users as soon as possible. G2G will reach its System Requirements Review stage in the first half of 2019. To be ready for that we are looking at:

    • clock technology and ensembles
    • inter satellite links
    • propulsion technology
    • flexible payloads and power allocation
    • 5G telecoms networks standards and what we need to do ensure we provide the timing services those networks will need and new signals with time to first fix (TTFF) and power requirements for acquisition of signal that are compatible with 5G devices. Look out for a new pilot signal E1-D to move forward on this.
    • Open Service authentication and support for ARAIM (Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring).

    Finally, 2018 will see the first contract awards of the Navigation Innovation Support Programme. This is a programme specifically designed to encourage R&D, new concepts and new products and to ensure that 2018 is not the last time ESA with the EC and its industrial partners deploy a GNSS service for GSA to operate that changes the world.

  • Innovation: GLONASS — past, present and future

    Innovation: GLONASS — past, present and future

    An Alternative and Complement to GPS

    A review of the history of the GLONASS program, its current status and an overview of the plans for the immediate future of the satellite constellation, its navigation signals and the ground support network.

    English versions of the GLONASS CDMA interface control documents are now available. See Further Reading.

    Richard Langley

    On Oct. 12, 1982, the Soviet Union launched the first GLONASS satellite. Whether in reaction to the development of GPS or simply to fulfill the requirement for a system with similar capabilities for its armed forces, the Soviet Union began the development of the Global’naya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema or Global Navigation Satellite System in 1976 just three years after the start of the GPS program. The first test satellite, code-named Kosmos 1413, was accompanied by two dummy or ballast satellites with the same approximate mass since the Soviet Union was already planning to launch three GLONASS satellites at a time with its powerful rockets to save on launch costs.

    But because of launch failures and the characteristically brief lives of the satellites, a further 70 satellites were launched before a fully populated constellation of 24 functioning satellites (providing full operational capability or FOC) was achieved in early 1996. Unfortunately, the full constellation was short-lived. Russia’s economic difficulties following the dismantling of the Soviet Union hurt GLONASS. Funds were not available, and by 2002 the constellation had dropped to as few as seven satellites, with only six available during maintenance operations! But Russia’s fortunes turned around, and with support from the Russian hierarchy, GLONASS was reborn. Longer-lived satellites were launched, as many as six per year, and slowly but surely a full constellation of 24 satellites returned. And on Dec. 8, 2011, FOC was again achieved and has been subsequently more or less maintained — the system has even operated sometimes with in-orbit spares.

    While GLONASS-only and survey-grade dual-system GPS/GLONASS receivers have been around for more than a decade, manufacturers took notice of GLONASS’s rebirth and began producing chips and receivers with GLONASS capability for the consumer market. In 2011, Garmin released handheld receivers supporting both GPS and GLONASS. In the same year, various cell-phone manufacturers started offering GLONASS capability with their embedded positioning modules. The early GPS/GLONASS receivers paved the way for the multi-GNSS receivers we have today, with their capability to track not just GPS and GLONASS satellites but those of the European Galileo and Chinese BeiDou systems, as well as those of the Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (not to mention the satellites of the satellite-based augmentation systems).

    I documented the development of GLONASS in this column back in July 1997, and a team of authors from the Joint Stock Company Russian Space Systems discussed the plans for modernizing GLONASS in an April 2011 article. An update is overdue. So, in this article, I will briefly review the history of the GLONASS program, discuss its current status, and overview the plans for the immediate future of the satellite constellation, its navigation signals and the ground support network.

    EARLY YEARS, PRESENT DAY

    During the Cold War, information about GLONASS was scarce. Apart from the general characteristics of the satellite orbits and the frequencies used for transmitting the navigation signals, the Ministry of Defence of the Soviet Union revealed little else. However, sleuthing by Professor Peter Daly and his students at the University of Leeds provided some details about the signals’ structure. With the advent of glasnost and perestroika, and the eventual demise of the Soviet Union, information about GLONASS became more readily available. Eventually, the Russians released the Interface Control Document (ICD). This document, similar in structure to the Navstar GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces ICD-GPS-200, describes the system, its components, and the structure of the signal and the navigation message intended for civil use. Its latest version was published in 2016, but so far this version is only publicly available in Russian.

    Satellites and Signals. Six models of GLONASS satellites (also known as Uragan, Russian for Hurricane) have been launched so far. Russia (actually the former Soviet Union) launched the first 10 satellites, called Block I, between October 1982 and May 1985. It sent up six Block IIa satellites between May 1985 and September 1986 and 12 Block IIb satellites between Apri1 1987 and May 1988, of which six were lost because of launch-vehicle-related failures. The fourth model was the Block IIv (v is the English transliteration of the Russian alphabet’s third letter). By the end of 2005, the Russians had deployed 60 Block IIvs. Each subsequent satellite generation contained equipment enhancements and also achieved longer lifetimes.

    A prototype GLONASS-M (for Modernized) satellite was launched on Dec. 1, 2001, along with two Block IIvs with the first two production GLONASS-M satellites included in the triplet launches of Dec. 10, 2003, and Dec. 26, 2004. Two GLONASS-M satellites were included in the triplet launch of Dec. 25, 2005. The new design offered many improvements, including better onboard electronics, a longer lifetime, an L2 civil signal, and an improved navigation message. Like earlier versions, the GLONASS-M spacecraft still used a pressurized, hermetically sealed cylinder for the electronics.

    FIGURE 1. Image from Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems, manufacturer of the GLONASS satellites, celebrating the 35th anniversary of the launch of the first GLONASS satellite in 1982 (“35 years of service to the world”).
    FIGURE 1. Image from Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems, manufacturer of the GLONASS satellites, celebrating the 35th anniversary of the launch of the first GLONASS satellite in 1982 (“35 years of service to the world”).

    All GLONASS satellites launched since December 2005 have been GLONASS-M satellites with the exception of two GLONASS-K1 (sometimes referred to as just GLONASS-K) satellites, launched on Feb. 26, 2011, and Nov. 30, 2014. GLONASS-K1 satellites are markedly different from their predecessors. They are lighter, use an unpressurized housing (similar to that of GPS satellites), have improved clock stability and a longer, 10-year design life. They also include, for the first time, code-division-multiple-access (CDMA) signals on a third frequency accompanying the legacy frequency-division-multiple-access signals (I’ll discuss these shortly). All of the GLONASS satellites have been manufactured by the Joint Stock Company Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems, located in Zheleznogorsk near Krasnoyarsk in central Siberia, and named after Mikhail Fyodorovich Reshetnev, the founding general director and chief designer. The Reshetnev company was formerly known as the Scientific Production Association of Applied Mechanics (Nauchno Proizvodstvennoe Ob”edinenie Prikladnoi Mekaniki or NPO PM). The Roscosmos State Corporation for Space Activities (formerly the Federal Space Agency), commonly known as Roscosmos, is the governmental body responsible for GLONASS.

    FIGURE 1 includes artist’s images of the initial GLONASS, GLONASS-M and GLONASS-K1 satellites.

    GLONASS satellite orbits are arrayed in three planes, separated from one another in right ascension of ascending node by 120 degrees, with eight satellites in each plane. The satellites within a plane are equally spaced, separated in argument of latitude by 45 degrees. Satellites in adjoining planes are shifted in argument of latitude by 15 degrees. The satellites are placed into nominally circular orbits with a target inclination of 64.8 degrees and semimajor axis of approximately 25,510 kilometers, giving them an orbital period of about 675.8 minutes. These satellites have ground tracks that repeat every 17 orbits or eight sidereal days. The GLONASS orbit planes are numbered 1–3 and contain orbital slots 1–8, 9–16 and 17–24, respectively.

    FIGURE 2 shows the status of the constellation on Oct. 17, 2017. The orbital slot number (also called almanac slot) and frequency channel (discussed below) are given in parentheses. The recently launched GLONASS 752 was set healthy on Oct. 16, 2017, resulting in a fully operational 24-satellite constellation. All of the satellites are standard GLONASS-M satellites except for GLONASS 755, which includes a transmitter for the new third frequency, and GLONASS 701K and 702K. These last two are GLONASS-K1 satellites, with 702K operational while 701K is undergoing flight tests. The “K” isn’t part of the official GLONASS number but has been added to avoid ambiguity. A GLONASS-M satellite launched on Dec. 10, 2003, was also called GLONASS 701. Similarly, the International GNSS Service (IGS) refers to GLONASS 701K and 702K as 801 and 802, respectively. IGS also designates GLONASS 751 as GLONASS 851 to prevent confusion with Kosmos 2080, a GLONASS-IIv satellite launched on May 19, 1990, and also called GLONASS 751. And it designates GLONASS 753 as GLONASS 853 to prevent confusion with Kosmos 2140, a GLONASS-IIv satellite launched on April 14, 1991, and also called GLONASS 751.

    FIGURE 2. Status of GLONASS constellation on Oct. 17, 2017. A green square identifies the location of a healthy satellite and orange, a test satellite. Orbital slot numbers and frequency channels are given in parentheses.

    The satellites have been traditionally launched three at a time by Proton boosters from the Baikonur Cosmodrome near Leninsk in Kazakhstan. However, starting with the launch of the first GLONASS-K1 satellite, several GLONASS satellites have been launched singly on Soyuz rockets from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome north of Moscow.

    Unlike GPS and the other GNSSs, GLONASS uses FDMA rather than CDMA for its legacy signals. Originally, the system transmitted the signals within two bands: Ll, 1602.0–1615.5 MHz, and L2, 1246.0–1256.5 MHz, at frequencies spaced by 0.5625 MHz at L1 and by 0.4375 MHz at L2:

    L1k = 1602. + 0.5625k (MHz)

    L2k = 1246. + 0.4375k (MHz)

    This arrangement provided 25 channels, so that each satellite in the full 24-satellite constellation could be assigned a unique frequency (with the remaining channel reserved for testing). Some of the GLONASS transmissions initially caused interference to radio astronomers, who study very weak natural radio emissions in the vicinity of the GLONASS frequencies. Radio astronomers use the frequency bands of 1610.6–1613.8 and 1660–1670 MHz to observe the spectral emissions from hydroxyl radical clouds in interstellar space, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has afforded them primary user status for this spectrum space. Also, ITU has allocated the 1610–1626.5-MHz band to operators of low-Earth-orbiting mobile communications satellites. As a result, the GLONASS authorities decided to reduce the number of frequencies used by the satellites and shift the bands to slightly lower frequencies.

    The system now uses only 14 primary frequency channels with k values ranging from –7 to +6, including two channels for testing purposes (currently –5 and –6). (The +7 channel has also been used in the past for testing purposes.) How can 24 satellites get by with only 14 channels? The solution is for antipodal satellites — satellites in the same orbit plane separated by 180 degrees in argument of latitude — to share the same channel. This approach is quite feasible because a user at any location on Earth will never simultaneously receive the signals from such a pair of satellites. The move to the new frequency assignments started in September 1993.

    Like the legacy GPS signals, the GLONASS signals include two pseudorandom noise (PRN) ranging codes: ST (for Standartnaya Tochnost or Standard Precision) and VT (for Visokaya Tochnost or High Precision) similar to the GPS C/A- and P-codes, respectively (but at half the chipping rates), modulated onto the L1 and L2 carriers.

    As with GPS, GLONASS transmits the high-precision code on both L1 and L2. But, unlike the GPS satellites, the GLONASS standard-precision code has also been transmitted on the L2 frequencies beginning with the GLONASS-M satellites. (A separate civil code, L2C, has been added to the GPS L2 signal transmitted by Block IIR-M and subsequent satellites.) The GLONASS ST code is 511 chips long with a rate of 511 kilochips per second, giving a repetition interval of 1 millisecond. The VT-code is 33,554,432 chips long with a rate of 5.11 megachips per second. The code sequence is truncated to give a repetition interval of 1 second. Unlike GPS satellites, all GLONASS satellites transmit the same codes. They derive signal timing and frequencies from one of the onboard atomic frequency standards (AFSs) operating at 5 MHz. The various GLONASS satellite series since Block II through to the GLONASS-M series have three cesium AFSs on each satellite. The transmitted signals are right-hand circularly polarized, like GPS signals, and have comparable signal strengths.

    Navigation Message. Like GPS and the other GNSSs, the GLONASS signals also contain navigation messages providing satellite orbit, clock and other information. Separate 50-bits-per-second navigation messages are modulo-2 added to the ST- and VT-codes. The ST-code message includes satellite clock epoch and rate offsets from GLONASS System Time; the satellite ephemeris given in terms of the satellite position, velocity and acceleration vectors at a reference epoch; and additional information such as synchronization bits, data age, satellite health, offset of GLONASS System Time from Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) as maintained by the National Metrology Institute of the Russian Federation UTC(SU) as part of the State Time and Frequency Service, and almanacs (approximate ephemerides) of all other GLONASS satellites. Note that, unlike GPS System Time, for example, GLONASS System Time has no integer offset from UTC and so leap-second jumps are added to GLONASS System Time simultaneously with those added to UTC. Note, however, that GLONASS System Time is offset by a constant three hours to match Moscow Standard Time (MSK, an abbreviation for Moscow).

    The full message lasts 2.5 minutes, and is continuously repeated between ephemeris updates (nominally once every 30 minutes), but the ephemeris and clock information is repeated every 30 seconds.

    The GLONASS authorities have not published, at least publicly, details of the VT-code navigation message. It is known, however, that the full message takes 12 minutes and that the ephemeris and clock information are repeated every 10 seconds.

    Geodetic System. GLONASS ephemerides are referenced to the Parametry Zemli 1990 (PZ-90 or, in English translation, Parameters of the Earth 1990, PE-90) geodetic system. PZ-90 replaced the Soviet Geodetic System 1985, SGS 85, used by GLONASS until 1993. PZ-90 is a terrestrial reference system with its coordinate frame defined in the same way as that of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). The initial realization of PZ-90 had an accuracy of one or two meters.

    However, in an effort to bring the system closer to the ITRF (and GPS’s WGS 84 geodetic reference system), two updates to PZ-90 were carried out. The first update, resulting in PZ-90.02 (referring to 2002), was adopted for GLONASS operations on Sept. 20, 2007, and brought the frame of the broadcast orbits (and hence derived receiver coordinates) closer to ITRF and WGS 84. Another realization, PZ-90.11, adopted on Dec. 31, 2013, reportedly reduced the differences to the sub-centimeter level.

    TABLE 1 lists the defining constants and parameters of PZ-90.

    TABLE 1. Fundamental geodetic constants and some of the parameters of the PZ-90 geodetic system as used by GLONASS.
    TABLE 1. Fundamental geodetic constants and some of the parameters of the PZ-90 geodetic system as used by GLONASS.

    The new GLONASS-K satellites transmit additional signals. GLONASS-K1 transmit a CDMA signal on a new L3 frequency (1202.025 MHz), and GLONASS-K2, in addition, will feature CDMA signals on the L1 and L2 frequencies.

    FIGURE 3. Circular reflector array on a GLONASS-K1 satellite, surrounding navigation signal inner antenna elements. Photo from Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems.
    FIGURE 3. Circular reflector array on a GLONASS-K1 satellite, surrounding navigation signal inner antenna elements. Photo from Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems.

    Control Segment. Similar to GPS and other GNSSs, GLONASS requires a network of ground stations for monitoring and maintaining the satellite constellation and for determining the orbits of the satellites and behavior of their operating AFSs. The tracking network uses stations only within the territory of the former Soviet Union, supplemented with satellite laser ranging stations to help with orbit determination since all GLONASS satellites contain laser reflectors (see FIGURE 3).

    Having a non-global network of tracking stations for determining the satellite orbits and AFS behavior results in slightly degraded GLONASS signal-in-space range error (SISRE). Recently, a number of tracking stations overseas have been established in conjunction with the development of the Russian satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS), the System for Differential Correction and Monitoring (SDCM). SDCM will function in a similar fashion to the Wide Area Augmentation System or WAAS, the U.S. SBAS, and the other SBASs in operation. The addition to the tracking network of the overseas SDCM stations, which already includes stations in Antarctica and South America with more stations coming, could help improve SISRE. Roscosmos also uses a global network of IGS and other tracking stations to monitor the health of the GLONASS constellation (see FIGURE 4).

    FIGURE 4. Roscosmos global GLONASS satellite health monitoring network with 22 reporting stations on Oct. 18, 2017, between 13:00 and 14:00 MSK.
    FIGURE 4. Roscosmos global GLONASS satellite health monitoring network with 22 reporting stations on Oct. 18, 2017, between 13:00 and 14:00 MSK.

    Performance. SISRE has improved over the years and is currently at the level of about 1 to 2 meters. In part, this is due to the better performance of the on-board AFSs carried by the latest GLONASS-M satellites compared to the first GLONASS-M satellites. Their relative one-day stability has improved from 10-13 to 2.4 × 10-14. FIGURE 5 shows a time series of recent values of SISRE determined by the Information and Analysis Center for Positioning, Navigation and Timing. These error levels can result in pseudorange-based positioning errors using GLONASS broadcast orbits and clocks about a factor of two worse than those provided by GPS — although, at any given instant, positioning accuracy will also be impacted by atmospheric effects and multipath and these could dominate the signal-in-space errors.

    FIGURE 5. GLONASS daily root-mean-square signal-in-space range error in meters as determined by the Information and Analysis Center for Positioning, Navigation and Timing.
    FIGURE 5. GLONASS daily root-mean-square signal-in-space range error in meters as determined by the Information and Analysis Center for Positioning, Navigation and Timing.

    Much higher positioning accuracies can be obtained using GLONASS orbits and clocks provided by the IGS and its participating analysis centers. This is particularly true if carrier-phase measurements are used instead of or as a supplement to pseudorange measurements. A combination of appropriately weighted GPS and GLONASS measurements has shown to be beneficial in terms of availability, accuracy and efficiency, especially for high-accuracy positioning carried out using the real-time kinematic or RTK approach. Furthermore, the precise point positioning (PPP) technique, based on real-time or post-processing of dual-frequency carrier-phase measurements with precise satellite ephemeris and clock data, has demonstrated that kinematic decimeter-level accuracy is possible using GLONASS data or GLONASS data in combination with GPS data. GLONASS-only static PPP solutions over 24 hours have achieved accuracies at the millimeter level.

    Users. The initial uptake of GLONASS by both civil and military users in the former Soviet Union and subsequently in Russia, not to mention outside Russia, was minimal. Prototype GLONASS-only receivers were developed for the military, and foreign GPS/GLONASS receivers were developed by several manufacturers for scientific and other advanced applications. The IGS added a set of GLONASS-tracking receivers to its network in 1998 and has continuously increased the number of such receivers since then. However, consumer use of GLONASS both within and outside Russia has only recently taken off with the development of GLONASS-only and combined GPS/GLONASS chipsets. Such chipsets are now featured in many mobile phones and in handheld GNSS receiver and vehicle navigation units.

    NEW AND IMPROVED

    As previously mentioned, the GLONASS-K1 satellites include a CDMA signal accompanying the legacy FDMA signals on a new L3 frequency of 1202.025 MHz. The ranging-code chipping rate for the CDMA signal is 10.23 megachips per second with a period of 1 milliseconds. It is modulated onto the carrier using quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK), with an in-phase data channel and a quadrature pilot channel. The set of possible ranging codes consists of 31 truncated Kasami sequences. (Kasami sequences, introduced by Tadao Kasami, a noted Japanese information theorist, are binary sequences of length 2m – 1 where m is an even integer. These sequences have good cross-correlation values approaching a theoretical lower bound. The Gold codes used in GPS are a special case of Kasami codes.) The full length of these sequences is 214 – 1 = 16,383 symbols, but the ranging code is truncated to a length of N = 10,230 with a period of 1 milliseconds.

    The associated navigation message symbols are transmitted at a rate of 100 bits per second with half-rate convolution coding. The so-called navigation message superframe (2 minutes long) will consist of 8 navigation frames (NFs) for 24 regular satellites in the GLONASS first modernization stage and 10 NFs (lasting 2.5 minutes) for 30 satellites in the future. Each NF (15 seconds long) includes 5 strings (3 seconds each). Every NF has a full set of ephemerides for the current satellite and part of the system almanac for three satellites. The full system almanac is broadcast in one superframe.

    The lighter, unpressurized K1 satellites feature two cesium and two rubidium AFSs. The relative daily stability of one of the rubidium AFSs on a K1 satellite is reported to be 4 ×10-14. As a result, the SISRE for this satellite is about 1 meter. Plans call for adding a CDMA signal to L2 on future versions of the K1 satellites, dubbed K1+ (see below).

    GLONASS-K2 Satellites. These satellites will be heavier than the K1 and K1+ satellites with greater capabilities including a CDMA signal at the GPS/Galileo L1/E1 frequency. Reshetnev ISS will initially build two K2 satellites before going into mass production. It had been planned to transition to the K2 satellites much sooner, only launching the two K1 satellites now in orbit. But apparently plans changed because of the sanctions restricting the delivery of radiation-resistant electronic components from the West.

    Now, Reshetnev ISS will build an additional nine GLONASS-K1 satellites. It’s not clear how many of these might be of the K1+ variety. The GLONASS-K1 satellites will now be transition satellites between the existing GLONASS-M satellites (including the half-dozen or so that have been manufactured and stored on the ground for future launch as needed) and the future GLONASS-K2 satellites.

    One of the first K2 satellites will host a passive hydrogen maser (PHM) AFS. The PHM has been under development for about a decade, and multiyear ground tests displayed a reliability and one-day stability of 5 × 10-15. It is expected to contribute to future 0.3-meter SISRE.

    According to a recent report, GLONASS-K2 satellites will begin flight tests in 2018, with mass production of GLONASS-K2 satellites to begin in the 2019–2020 time frame.

    Improved Tracking Networks. The development of the SDCM and its associated tracking network has already been mentioned. The SDCM network stations are equipped with combined GPS/GLONASS dual-frequency receivers, hydrogen maser atomic clocks and direct communication links for real-time data transfer. As mentioned earlier, GLONASS authorities are looking at whether additionally using the SDCM stations for GLONASS orbit and clock determination would significantly enhance the accuracy of the broadcast data.

    CONCLUSION

    GPS, the oldest GNSS, is continuing to modernize and will soon launch the first Block III or GPS III satellite. Already, GPS Block IIR-M and Block IIF satellites are transmitting new signals. Galileo is fielding modern satellites right from the get go, and BeiDou is about to start launching the operational version of its BeiDou-3 satellites. GLONASS is not to be outdone. It has provided useful positioning, navigation and timing services since at least 1996. While at times the service level has dropped below acceptable levels, it is now a dependable system and, with announced improvements, will be a contender in the future world of multi-GNSS.

    FURTHER READING

    • Official GLONASS Update

    GLONASS Programme Update” by I. Revnivykh presented at the 11th Meeting of the International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Sochi, Russia, Nov. 6–11, 2016.

    • In-depth Description of GLONASS

    “GLONASS” by S. Revnivykh, A. Bolkunov, A. Serdyukov and O. Montenbruck, Chapter 8 in Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by P.J.G. Teunissen and O. Montenbruck, published by Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017.

    • Official GLONASS Websites

    Information and Analysis Center for Positioning, Navigation and Timing

    Russian System of Differential Correction and Monitoring

    • GLONASS Interface Control Documents

    GLONASS Interface Control Document, Navigational Radiosignal in Bands L1, L2, Edition 5.1, Russian Institute of Space Device Engineering, Moscow, 2008.

    GLONASS Interface Control Document, General Description of Code Division Multiple Access Signal System, Edition 1.0, JSC Russian Space Systems, Moscow, 2016.

    GLONASS Interface Control Document, Code Division Multiple Access Open Service Navigation Signal in L1 Frequency Band, Edition 1.0, JSC Russian Space Systems, Moscow, 2016.

    GLONASS Interface Control Document, Code Division Multiple Access Open Service Navigation Signal in L2 Frequency Band, Edition 1.0, JSC Russian Space Systems, Moscow, 2016.

    GLONASS Interface Control Document, Code Division Multiple Access Open Service Navigation Signal in L3 Frequency Band, Edition 1.0, JSC Russian Space Systems, Moscow, 2016.

    System of Differential Correction and Monitoring Interface Control Document, Radiosignals and Digital Data Structure of GLONASS Wide Area Augmentation System, System of Differential Correction and Monitoring, Edition 1, JSC Russian Space Systems, Moscow, 2012.

    • Earlier GPS World Articles on GLONASS

    GLONASS: Developing Strategies for the Future” by Y. Urlichich, V. Subbotin, G. Stupak, V. Dvorkin, A. Povalyaev and S. Karutin in GPS World, Vol. 22, No. 4, April 2011, pp. 42–49.

    GPS, GLONASS, and More: Multiple Constellation Processing in the International GNSS Service” by T. Springer and R. Dach in GPS World, Vol. 21, No. 6, June 2010, pp. 48–58.

    The Future is Now: GPS + GLONASS + SBAS= GNSS” by L. Wanninger in GPS World, Vol. 19, No. 7, July 2008, pp. 42–48.

    GLONASS: Review and Update” by R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 8, No. 7, July 1997, pp. 46–50. Correction: GPS World, Vol. 8, No. 9, Sept. 1997, p. 71. Available on line:

    GLONASS Spacecraft” by N.L. Johnson in GPS World, Vol. 5, No 11, Nov. 1994, pp. 51–58.

  • Iridium launches alternative GPS PNT service

    Iridium Communications Inc. has introduced its Satellite Time and Location (STL) service, an alternative or complement to traditional indoor and outdoor location-based technologies, and declared it ready for use. STL’s position, navigation and timing (PNT) technology is deployed through Iridium’s 66 cross-linked, low-earth orbit satellite constellation.

    Through Iridium satellites and in GNSS receivers, STL technology can work to verify GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and other navigation services, and also can serve as an alternative for those services when GPS signals are degraded or unavailable. STL also can provide an alternative source of time when testing GPS signals.

    Iridium is working with Satelles, a division of iKare Corporation, as its primary technology partner. Satelles enables Iridium’s paging channels to reach small, low-cost receivers in nearly any environment, the company says in a news release.

    “We think STL can help solve an important and growing problem for governments and businesses, and serve as a platform for continued innovation,” says Matt Desch, chief executive officer at Iridium. “With STL, we are introducing a global capability that is already in space, technologically ready for use and is independent of any particular location technology. The team at Satelles has been able to leverage the unique capabilities that our network offers to create a solution that can ultimately be integrated into almost any kind of platform, including other Iridium machine-to-machine devices, heavy machinery, automobiles and even the power grid, to name a few. Once implemented, STL could revolutionize the way the world’s largest, global companies and governments operate and manage cyber security.”

    In a chipset about the size of a postage stamp, the technology can be embedded into many devices. STL’s signal strength may make spoofing GPS systems more difficult, the company says. STL transmits its signals through Iridium’s satellite constellation to deliver a unique code to each position on the ground that can be independently authenticated, which allows operation or access only if the user is in the location expected.

    “Commercial users are now able to use STL to deliver trustworthy timing solutions for critical infrastructure, such as LTE networks, transactional data centers and the power grid,” says Greg Gutt, president and chief technology officer of Satelles. “Military and government users can also acquire these commercial off-the-shelf solutions for the Department of Defense and other government applications. In addition to enhancing the security and resiliency of GPS, STL technology can be embedded into servers anywhere in the world to geo-fence data and applications, providing trusted time and location data as an independent factor for end-point authentication.”

    The STL solution has been successfully demonstrated across multiple sectors, including military, academia and commercial applications. The technology is available today and will be supported by Iridium NEXT, the Iridium’s next-generation global satellite constellation, which is scheduled for completion by late 2017, the company says.

  • Happy 20th Anniversary, GPS!

    The Global Positioning System marks its 20th year of operation on Monday, April 27. Below is a timeline showing important milestones in the 20 years since the constellation reached full operational capability (FOC) on April 27, 1995.

    FOC was formally announced on July 17, 1995.

     

    GPS Operational History Timeline


    Featured image: U.S. Air Force