Blog

  • Solar Burst Impacts GPS

    On December 6, 2006, the sun emitted a burst of radio energy that impacted the performance of GPS receivers all over the sunlit side of the Earth. That the sun produces radio emissions is not surprising. What is surprising is that on this day they were extremely powerful. The sun continuously emits energy across a broad region of the radio spectrum. The flux density of these emissions is normally fairly low and contributes imperceptibly to the background radio noise collected by GPS receiver antennas.

    However, when a solar flare occurs, it is often accompanied by very powerful bursts of radio energy. Although they are more numerous near the peak of the solar sunspot cycle when the sun is more disturbed, solar flares and their associated strong radio bursts can occur at anytime – including near the current sunspot minimum. Still, the December 6 solar radio burst came as a surprise. It was one of the largest on record and had an impact on all GPS receivers on the sunlit side of the Earth, including most of North America, South America, and the Pacific Ocean. The added noise significantly reduced carrier-to-noise-densities (C/N0 – a measure of the strength of received signals) at both the L1 and L2 frequencies by as much as 15 dB-Hz. This resulted in receivers losing lock on some satellites for many minutes, particularly those at low elevation angles with low C/N0 values before the burst’s arrival. Those receivers closer to the sub-solar point were typically affected more than those further away as more or the burst energy was picked up by the receiver antennas.

    Nevertheless, it appears that a lot of single-frequency receivers continued to provide navigation solutions with as few as four satellites — and even three in 2D mode — and the noise burst went unnoticed by most users of such receivers. However, many dual-frequency receivers used for high-accuracy applications including those at reference stations suffered significant signal losses, particularly at the L2 frequency. As well, military receivers in some sectors lost the ability to navigate. A “widespread loss of GPS” in the Four Corners region of New Mexico and Colorado was reported by military authorities. Several aircraft reported losing lock on GPS signals with the number of tracked satellites dropping from 7-9 to 1 or even none!

    Alessandro Cerruti, a graduate student at Cornell University, is among a group of scientists and engineers studying the effects of this and other solar radio bursts on the operation of GPS receivers. He has examined the data provided by the receivers in the International GNSS Service (IGS) network on the sunlit side of the Earth. The number of stations providing data at both frequencies on at least four satellites dropped from more than 120 to below 60 during the burst. The timing of the drop-outs coincides with the power of the burst which is shown in the lower panel.

    The burst power was recorded at the Owens Valley Solar Array (OVSA) in California’s high desert. Operated by the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research, OVSA records solar radio emissions at over a range of frequencies and polarizations including right-hand circular polarization (RHCP) at 1.6 GHz, very near the GPS L1 frequency. As the plot shows, noise power exceed one million solar flux units at the peaks of the burst, making this burst one of the largest on record.

    Alessandro Cerruti has also looked at data from the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) which is very robust and although WAAS continued to operate throughout the period of the burst, signals at the WAAS reference stations suffered significant degradations as elsewhere. The C/N0 values for PRN 4 as recorded at the Houston reference station on both the L1 and L2 frequency for a quiet day and on December 6. The drop in C/N0 values during the burst is very dramatic.

    Mitigation. What can be done, if anything, to mitigate the effects of solar radio bursts? As the bursts are broadband noise, it is difficult for a receiver to discriminate them from GPS signals. Some antenna designs, such as choke rings, attenuate signals arriving at low elevation angles, so if the sun is low in the sky at the time of a burst, receivers with such antennas will be less impacted than those with conventional antenna designs. And as a receiver loses track primarily on satellites at low elevation angles, having more satellites at higher elevation angles will also help. So receivers operating with a mixed constellation of GPS and GLONASS or GPS and Galileo satellites should be better able to weather a solar radio burst than those operating with GPS alone. Similarly, a larger GPS constellation by itself would help.

    Modernization. Stronger transmitted signals from future GPS satellites might allow receivers to continue tracking even low-angle satellites during a large burst. Newer signal formats, which could be tracked at lower C/N0 values, would also help receivers to contend with the sun’s outbursts. Even current receiver technology developed for anti-jamming protection and for indoor GPS use would allow receivers to track to much lower C/N0 values and perhaps sail through even very strong solar radio bursts.

    As we approach the peak of the next sunspot cycle in 2012, we can expect more solar radio bursts. Some forecasts peg the next peak at 30–50 percent stronger than the last one as measured by the fraction of the sun’s visible hemisphere with sunspot activity. Will future solar radio bursts have as dramatic an effect as the burst of December 6, 2006? Time will tell.

     — Richard Langley

  • DARPA Seeks GPS Complement

    A Boeing-led team is working on a so-called Robust Surface Navigation (RSN) concept for the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The objective of the RSN program is to develop navigation technology that can be exploited in the event GPS signals are jammed, blocked or otherwise unavailable.

    In theory an RSN system would utilize various “signals of opportunity” — signals emanating from satellites, but also those emanating from cell phone towers and television transmission towers, for example — to provide precise location and navigation information to users on the ground.

    “The challenge is to develop an integrated system that can use all available signals — not just GPS — to provide accurate navigation information through one small receiver, thereby eliminating the need for an expensive, fixed infrastructure,” Bart Ferrell, Boeing Phantom Works program manager for Precision Navigation Programs, said in a statement.

    The Boeing-led RSN team is beginning its 15-month Phase 1 concept development contract. The team includes Rosum of Mountain View, Calif.; Shared Spectrum, of Vienna, Va.; and veteran GPS navigation company Navsys.

    Rosum has used broadcast television signals to locate mobile assets and has combined television and GPS signals in location-based applications. Shared Spectrum supplies cognitive radio technologies for government and commercial customers with challenging radio communications and networking needs. Its expertise includes defense communications in extremely challenging RF conditions and commercial communications involving novel approaches to sharing and managing spectrum access.

  • L5 Contract Awarded to Lockheed Martin

    The U.S. Air Force has awarded Lockheed Martin a $6 million contract to develop and demonstrate a payload that will temporarily transmit a third civil signal, on the L5 frequency at 1176MHz, from a  Block IIR-M satellite.

    Previous plans called for the L5 civil signal, aimed principally at safety requirements in civil aviation, to appear on the Block IIF satellites. Early speculation posits that the Air Force may want to conduct some signal testing before the IIFs are launched, or secure the frequency according to ITU requirements, as GIOVE-A did for Galileo.

    Lockheed Martin and its navigation payload supplier ITT will provide an in-orbit demonstration of the new civil signal.

  • GPS Contract Awarded to SAIC for Systems Engineering

    The Air Force Space and Missiles Systems Center’s GPS Wing has announced a new contract to the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) team for systems engineering and integration (SE&I). Contract value is $217 million if all options and maximum award fee are exercised over the five-year contract period of performance.

    “This is an important shift in how the Air Force manages space acquisition programs,” said Lt. Gen. Michael Hamel, SMC commander. The announcement cited increased modernization activity in virtually every element of  the GPS enterprise as a driving force for the change.

    The Air Force continues to serve as the responsible program authority “systems integrator,” with full responsibility, authority and accountability for the system-wide engineering and integration of the entire GPS enterprise — space, ground, and user equipment. The new SE&I contract will have specific deliverable products using documented work plans and product-oriented focus which will ensure engineering process discipline, interface, and configuration control as well as rigor and consistency across the entire GPS organization, according to the announcement.

    The SAIC team for SE&I includes: LinQuest, Booz Allen Hamilton, Harris, General Dynamics, Raytheon, Loral Space Systems, Ducom Inc, Epsilon Systems Solutions, Inc, Integrity Applications Inc, MacAulay Brown Inc, MCR Federal Inc, Munoz Engineering Inc (MEI) Technologies, Overlook Systems Technologies Inc, Saalex Solutions Inc, and Teledyne Brown Engineering.

  • Trimble Introduces Handheld Data Collection Device

    Trimble has introduced the Juno ST handheld, a portable data collection solution supported by the company’s field and office software. It comes standard with a built-in GPS receiver, Microsoft Windows Mobile version 5.0 software, and Wi-Fi/Bluetooth for wireless connectivity to office networks, cameras, and mobile phones.

    The Juno ST handheld’s low price point facilitates large-scale deployment, according to Trimble, allowing a company or organization to equip a significant number of its employees; it is especially practical for use in applications where high productivity is most important. Examples include natural resources organizations, utility companies, and government agencies conducting inspection and permitting tasks. The Juno ST handheld is also fully compatible with other Trimble data collection systems, utilizing the same software and workflows as the entire range of Trimble Mapping & GIS solutions.

    Delivering a range of 2- to 5-meter positioning, real-time or postprocessed, the unit incorporates a high-sensitivity GPS receiver and has been designed to maximize yield of positions in hostile environments, such as under forest canopy and up against buildings. For use in a vehicle, an external antenna can be added.

    “The Juno ST handheld is ideal for companies and organizations that need to deploy a large number of data collection systems in the field,” said Doug Merrill, general manager of Trimble’s Mapping & GIS Division. “Small and light enough to fit in your pocket, the Juno ST can easily complement an existing field operation and can be added into your current workflow.”

    The unit weighs 4.8 ounces (133 grams) and measures approximately 4.3 in X 2.4 in X 0.7 in (10.9 cm X 6.0 cm X 1.9 cm). The handheld has 128 MB of non-volatile Flash data storage and a Secure Digital (SD) card slot for additional data storage. The removable Li-Ion battery is rechargeable and lasts for up to eight hours.

    The Juno ST provides flexibility with Windows Mobile 5.0 software and includes Microsoft productivity tools such as Word Mobile, Excel Mobile, Internet Explorer Mobile, and Outlook Mobile.

  • Survey Perspectives – April 2007

    Getting Personal, Now

    Ok, this column is supposed to be about high-precision GNSS, right? Well, who would have ever thought I’d be inclined to write about consumer GPS receivers? Certainly not me. Sometimes, I even speak rather condescendingly about those “Wal-Mart GPS units” because they seem to be mis-used so often in the survey/construction business.

    But with the explosive growth of Personal Navigation Devices (PNDs) and being the GPS technology-aholic I am, I had to give some of these a try. Surprisingly, I became addicted to them in short order. Mind you, I already have an in-dash GPS navigation system in my car so this isn’t a new concept to me. So why the big fuss?

    First of all, let’s define a PND so everyone’s on the same page.

    The newer PNDs are roughly the size of a slice of French bread with a 3”-4” LCD touch screen. Its primary function is to guide you from Point A to Point B by providing you turn-by-turn instructions on the map screen and via voice instructions. Seriously — it talks to you. It typically comes with a street/address map database of the region where you bought it such as North America, Europe, etc. It runs on batteries or vehicle power and comes with some sort of windshield or dashboard mount.

    Whereas legacy PNDs were bulky and ran a short time on batteries and were really designed to stay mounted in your car, the newer PNDs are slim. They are designed to be truly portable with features that support “grab and go” functionality like ruggedness and extended battery operations.

    The PND did its job of getting me to where I needed to go. But the great part about it was that when I needed to alter plans, like a last-minute dinner meeting, it was perfect. With my old Mapquest method, I would have scrambled to find directions.

    But, secondly, perhaps what surprised me most and what prompted me to focus this month’s column on PNDs is the response I’ve been receiving from people who see me using the PND. I’m not talking about soccer Mom’s or Joe consumer. I’m talking about architects, construction superintendents, engineers: professional types. I’ve been on project sites where these types of people see me using the PND and they start asking questions.

    Most see it as a really productive business tool because they spend a lot of time traveling from one project site to another and aren’t necessarily familiar with the local hotels, restaurants, reprographic vendors, construction material vendors, and so on.

    Some have even exclaimed they can’t believe there’s not a monthly subscription fee. There’s not. Although after a couple of years of ownership, you’d probably want to purchase an updated map database.

    So the pessimist in me asked what happens if I become too dependent on the thing. After three days in San Francisco, I’d used the PND exclusively to navigate my way around the different suburbs. At the end of my trip, I dialed up the rental car location on the PND and let her take me home. Sure enough, about 10 min. from the airport, the screen went blank. No warning, no nothing. Dead battery. After a few seconds of “uh oh, what am I’m going to do now?” I remember I packed the car charger. I pulled over, plugged it in and off I went. But, it made me think about what I would have done otherwise. My conclusion was that, worst case, I pull over and ask for directions.

    The attractive feature of the “grab and go” functionality with new generation PNDs is that they aren’t tied to a specific vehicle. I found myself throwing it on the seat of rental cars and not using the windshield mount at all. To me, there was not enough value in hooking it up all that mounting hardware. I’d rather stuff it in my laptop bag and pull it out when I need it. I can imagine a small survey outfit having one unit in the office that folks check out for the day no matter which rig they are taking in the field.

    Another attractive feature for survey/construction professionals is that some of the new generation PNDs allow you to load topo maps in addition to having turn-by-turn directions, points of interest, etc.

    Time is money and it doesn’t take an MBA to figure out that if the PND saves time getting folks to each project site faster, it’s a no brainer at the ~$500 price tag.

    L1 RTK follow-up

    I promised I wouldn’t visit this subject again until products starting hitting the streets. It’s starting to happen. read more >>

  • Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging Participating in 2007 AAG Annual Meeting

    Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging has announced its participation at the 2007 AAG Annual Meeting, April 17-21, 2007, at the San Francisco Hilton, San Francisco, California. Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging will be exhibiting in booth #906 and showcasing the following products: ERDAS IMAGINE 9.1, Image Analysis for ArcGIS, Stereo Analyst for ArcGIS, IMAGINE Easytrace, Leica MosaicPro, and IMAGINE DeltaCue. In addition, geospatial imaging experts from Leica Geosystems will be present to answer questions and provide information.

    “The AAG Annual Meeting is a premier event for both the educational and commercial geographic community that crosses many existing and new markets,” said Steve Jennings, Director of Americas Sales, Leica Geosystems Geospatial Imaging. “As a proud participant, Leica and its partners are committed to providing the most accurate and efficient solutions to the academic and professional attendees at AAG. The explosion of geographic information, imagery and visualization in 2007 is unprecedented.”

    This year’s annual meeting will discuss research, education, and developments in geography.

  • Rosum Comments on 9-1-1 Location Capability

    Rosum Corporation commented on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation’s April 10 hearing on “VoIP and the Future of 9-1-1 Services.”  Rosum also responded to recent remarks by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin on the need for more accurate location determination of E9-1-1 calls from mobile devices.

    “There are multiple trends in consumer telephony today that highlight the need for reliable ‘in-building 9-1-1’ location capability”, said Skip Speaks, CEO of Rosum Corporation. Speaks noted four specific trends: the growth in wireless-only subscribers who use their wireless handset as a primary line, the growth in users of nomadic VoIP services and users of VoIP lines as a primary line, data showing the bulk of wireless 9-1-1 calls are made indoors, and the emergence of home base stations that need to be located indoors for activation and 9-1-1 purposes.

    Speaks continued, “As these new capabilities enter the home, they expand the definition of the home telephone. One can expect that a 9-1-1 call made over the traditional home phone connected by copper wire will result in first responders going to the right address. While substantial resources have been invested by providers of wireless and Internet telephony service to implement E9-1-1 service, it is clear that there is still work to be done to ensure that accurate, actionable location information is consistently delivered to our first responders. We encourage the Senate Commerce Committee and the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a thoughtful review of the future of 9-1-1 services, with a focus on in-building 9-1-1 performance. There is every reason for consumers to expect rapid and accurate response to 9-1-1 calls regardless of the technology they have chosen.”

    Rosum also presented on the subject of “Reliable Location for In-Building 9-1-1 and First Response” at the Geospatial Integration for Public Safety Conference, co-organized by the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) and the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA), on April 16 in New Orleans.

  • FCC Brings Focus to E911

    Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin plans to issue new rules for testing location-based E911 service, as well as a call for public comment on the technology itself. The FCC chair plans to rule soon that testing of location-based enhanced 911 wireless accuracy be conducted at local emergency call centers rather than at the state level. The Association of Public Safety Communications Officials International petitioned the FCC for such a move several years ago.

    APCO will soon release its Project LOCATE (Locate Our Citizens in Times of Emergencies) report. The report studied the accuracy of location information that public safety answering points get from 911 calls made from wireless phones.

    Martin plans to seek public comment on E911 technological advances and prospects for an across-the-board industry deployment of a hybrid approach to E911, which draws on both GPS technology in handsets as well as network triangulation techniques.

  • Orion Partners with Sky-Shine

    Orion Technology Inc. has formed a partnership with Sky-Shine Corporation Sdn. Bhd., a firm specializing in GIS development and mapping services, surveying and mapping systems, and environmental and laboratory instrumentation in Malaysia.

    Sky-Shine offers a full range of geospatial information technology services, from data conversion to application development and implementation. It serves both public- and private-sector agencies, and provides services in GIS system development and implementation, digital mapping and data acquisition, data conversion, and remote sensing.

    Sky-Shine is the distributor of Digital Globe’s QuickBird high-resolution satellite imagery product and provides value-added services to the remote sensing industry in the region. In addition, Sky-Shine is also a distributor for GeoExpress from LizardTech, a geospatial software package for managing, distributing, and accessing complex geospatial imagery. As an ESRI business partner in Malaysia, Sky-Shine serves clients in various sectors including government, private, and educational institutions.

    “We are committed to exceeding customer expectations for quality and prompt delivery. Being a partner of Orion, our vision becomes more global, and more focused on system and data integration. Our ‘GeoWeb’ initiative, powered by OnPoint, will be the platform of geo services within Malaysia,” noted Zalizan Mohd Salleh, technical manager of Sky-Shine.

    By using Orion’s OnPoint Web-GIS solution, Sky-Shine will enhance its services pertaining to spatial data access and solution integration, for both their existing clients and new clients in the region. OnPoint comes with an administration tool, providing a simple user interface to create Configuration Files that define views. The user can easily change the appearance, functionality, data content, and security of OnPoint. OnPoint allows users to publish their GIS data quickly and securely over the Web and connect to any spatial and nonspatial data throughout their organization, turning their Web-GIS into a true enterprise solution.

    “OnPoint continues to gain further acceptance throughout the world as the standard for Web-GIS. Sky-Shine is a well-established firm that shares our commitment to delivering quality, leading edge solutions to clients. Sky-Shine has significant opportunities to leverage OnPoint in the Malaysian market, and we look forward to working with them in this regard,” commented Faizal Hasham, director of Sales and Marketing at Orion.

  • AmbientNAV Releases Marine LCD Monitors

    AmbientNAV has launched a line of marine LCDs featuring its SeaEye technology. The SeaEye electronic design reduces internal operation heat and the effects of ambient temperature, while the display technology minimizes solar thermal gain, eliminating blooming and black splotches associated with the breakdown of LCD crystals due to heat; this also eliminates the need for an internal fan. Designed for operation in rugged marine conditions, these monitors incorporate advancements in optical bonding, backlighting circuitry, optical enhancement films, and anti-glare/anti-reflective treatments to the external glass surface.

    SeaEye monitors employ a fully enclosed aluminum and stainless steel case design as well as bonded glass, both of which serve to eliminate water egress, internal condensation, screen fogging, and corrosion. SeaEye monitors also incorporate an easily accessible rotary analog control knob that allows for adjustment of the backlight from full brightness to off (less than 1 nit) for safe night operation. Unlike other monitors that dim to red at night, SeaEye monitors dim to black, minimizing confusion and loss of information when using navigational chart images with red coloration.

    “Our SeaEye technology represents a quantum leap in not only image clarity in all lighting conditions, but in overall performance and product life,” said Peter Meagher, president, AmbientNAV.

    All SeaEye-enabled monitors feature custom-designed, fully isolated power supplies with a voltage input range of 9-36 VDC, and powder-coated, anodized aluminum enclosures with a NMEA 4x rating. The thin bezel design (3/8-inch lip) reduces the footprint of the monitors. Monitors can be mounted with either a quick clamp mount for rigid flush mounting, or the VESA and RAM mount points located on the back of the monitor.

    The new AmbientNAV SeaEye product lineup comprises two 15-inch and two 17-inch LCD monitors, available in both daylight-viewable models (MDDL) and enhanced sunlight-viewable models (MDSL), with multi-port inputs including, RGB, DVI-D, S-video and composite video. The 15-inch monitors offer a contrast ratio greater that 500:1, 160-degree-plus viewing angles, support for display resolutions ranging from 640×480 to 1280×1024 (1024×768 native). The 17-inch models offer a contrast ratio greater that 700:1, 170-degree+ vertical and horizontal viewing angles, and support for display resolutions ranging from 640×480 to 1280×1024 (1280×1024 native). All monitors have an operating temperature range of 0-60 degrees Celsius, and an amperage draw of 1.5 amps (daylight models) and 2.5 amps (sunlight models) at 12 volts.

  • GPS Insights – April 2007

    Ubiquity and the Joint Navigation Conference

    OK, there I was, straight and level at 6,000 feet, when . . . .

    Now, fellow aviators among you will recognize this as the classic opening line at the bar when aviators talk with their hands, shoot their watch, and probably tell a tall tale while they are at it. But seriously, folks, there I was at 6,000 feet, which in the Rocky Mountains simply means I was headed North toward the Denver airport at o-dark-thirty on a snowy morning.

    I was enroute to the Joint Navigation Conference in Orlando and was naturally thinking about my next column. My newest GPS appliance shone brightly against a dark windscreen, the snow flew, and my favorite national public radio station played softly in the background.

    As I thought about how tp address the phrase “GPS has become a utility” in my column, I heard a report about British special operations hostages held in Iran for supposedly being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Hoping to hear they had been released, I turned up the volume just in time to hear a female interviewer ask the on-scene reporter something like, “Isn’t there some satellite thingy that will tell us where the British soldiers really were? I mean, you know, something in space that tells us where we are. Didn’t they have something like that?”

    No doubt she was talking about GPS, and while that’s heartening, my point here is she did not know what it was. GPS has become such a ubiquitous global utility in our daily lives that some don’t know any more about it other than that it is some satellite ‘thingy’ in space.

    That’s fine as far as it goes, but it points out a vulnerability of our current system. If you were to ask the American public or any global “public” to vote on whether to continue to fund and support the United States GPS, would they even know what it was? I am not denigrating reporters or the American public here, but just making the point that “the satellite thingy in space” is a ubiquitous global utility that we take for granted, and would find it inconvenient at best, and crippling at worst, to live without.

    Think I am overstating my case? Think again. I recently had the pleasure to participate in a very high-level think-tank study that determined, among other things, that if GPS were to fail today, there is an excellent chance that credit cards would not function, gas pumps would not operate, cell phones would not work, internet, bank and stock transactions would slow to a crawl, and on and on.

    To fully understand this, remember that the Global Positioning System is also known as a PNT or Positioning, Navigation and Timing system. The position and navigation part is what we generally think of, but in reality more than 90 percent of the users of GPS worldwide use it primarily for a timing reference. GPS is based on atomic clocks in space, and the timing signal is classified as a Stratum 1 signal, which means it is accurate and stable to 1×10-11 or better.

    At this minimum accuracy, a properly calibrated source will provide bit-stream timing that will not change relative to an absolute or perfect standard more than once every five months. Atomic standards such as Cesium clocks, which are used in GPS satellites, have far better performance. I won’t belabor this point now because I plan a series of articles considering the importance of GPS time at a later date. Suffice it to say this is a very accurate timing signal and is the heart of the GPS infrastructure.

    This timing discussion provides a nice segue to the topic of LORAN and eLORAN, which last month I listed as a key augmentation for the perfect handheld GPS transceiver. Several of you asked why and there are a myriad of reasons including: LORAN is a mature and proven system with much greater signal strength (you can use it indoors), but for our purposes here, know that it is also classified as a Stratum 1 timing signal, and for North America and certain other parts of the world it can and does currently serve as a GPS time reference augmentation/back-up system.

    JNC Briefing on Jamming Incident

    Why do we need a backup? Here is a classic case in point.

    At the JNC in Orlando, we heard from U.S. Coast Guard Captain Matthew Blizard, the commander of the USCG Center of Excellence for Navigation (NAVCEN), including GPS. Captain Blizard detailed a case study that should be a wake-up call for all GPS users and help point out the criticality of augmentations and back-ups for our ubiquitous global utility that we all too often take for granted (GPS World editor-in-chief Alan Cameron briefly mentioned this incident in the March issue).

    The quick version of the incident, which is full of irony, goes something like this. The U.S. Navy was conducting a scheduled communications jamming training exercise in the Port of San Diego. Two Navy ships participated in the exercise for approximately two hours. Although it involved communications jamming, GPS agencies such as the GPS Operations Center at Schriever AFB, Colorado (GPSOC) and the USCG NAVCEN were not notified because the intended jamming was not planned in the GPS L-band regime. But jam GPS they did — unintentionally of course — and the jamming continued for approximately two hours.

    When the technicians involved could not get their GPS on the second ship (the one being jammed) to initialize, they began to suspect there might be a problem. They suspected ‘they’ were the problem and were inadvertently jamming GPS. They immediately returned to the first ship and shut down the jammer.

    However, once the jamming began, it was less than 30 minutes before NAVCEN and the GPSOC and other organizations started receiving calls concerning GPS outages in the San Diego harbor area. The outages affected telephone switches and cellular phone operations and even shut down a hospital’s mobile paging system. General aviation GPS navigation equipment outages were reported, but no commercial airlines were affected, or at least none officially reported any outages. Reports continued to flow in for more than four hours.

    The Navy technicians shut down the unintentional jamming signal, but did not report the incident outside of normal channels. Consequently, it took NAVCEN and supporting agencies 72 hours to pinpoint the jamming source.

    The irony here is that the SPAWAR Systems Center for the GPS JPO (now GPS Wing) NAVWAR effort is located in San Diego and they routinely run jamming scenarios, simulations, and engage in modeling exactly what happened that day in the San Diego harbor — but reports indicate they were unaware of this incident until after it had occurred.

    Captain Blizard accepts that 72 hours to locate a jamming source, intentional or otherwise, is entirely too long. He and his NAVCEN team are working with the GPSOC, the Joint Space Operations Center (JSPOC) at Vandenberg AFB in California, and other agencies to put procedures in place to effectively shrink the timeline to find the source of the jamming to 20 minutes or less. All these players want to ensure that in the future, these incidents are so short-lived that users will not even notice them before they are resolved.

    There are lots of lessons learned here, and too many to go into in the space remaining, but this incident clearly emphasizes the vulnerability of our extremely low-power GPS signal to jamming and unintentional interference. It is also clear that we are not yet equipped nor have sufficient procedures in place to pinpoint jamming in a timely manner and take actions to negate it. However, it inspires confidence when you hear Captain Blizzard relate the incident, because you know he is working the solution hard. There was no attempted cover-up, it is all out in the open, warts, ironies and all, and it is clear that the solution is getting plenty of attention.

    The Perfect Military Receiver

    In light of the above incident, where does this leave us with our Perfect Handheld GPS Transceiver? Would it have been affected, or would it have continued to perform normally?

    Although I have not mentioned anti-jam capabilities specifically, using that nomenclature, almost all the features we have mentioned so far (see last month’s newsletter for the list) would have had an effect on the jamming problem.

    Since it receives all the GPS frequencies, those not affected by the jamming would have continued to perform — M-code for example — plus GLONASS would have still been received, along with any out-of-band pseudolite signals and hopefully several augmentations. The point is that almost any additional features that boost the power of the signal, receive additional signals, and monitor jamming or interference, would have made our transceiver impervious to the incident in question. They are all anti-jam modalities in one form or another. Of course, a stronger GPS signal in the first place might have made the entire scenario moot, but that is a discussion for another time.

    What shall we add to our Perfect Handheld GPS Transceiver this time to make it more complete? Several of you wrote to say that anti-jam features should be at the top of my list, and hopefully I have explained that they indeed already are, but they are not just anti-jam features, they are much more than that, when you consider them in the correct venue.

    So this time, let’s add the following technologies and features to our Perfect Handheld GPS Transceiver (PHGPST):

    • micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology or nanotechnology
    • An embedded atomic clock or Stratum-1 time source
    • Gigabytes of storage
    • Fast processor

    By the time you read this column, I will have attended the ESRI Partners-only Conference in Palm Springs, California, the Joint Navigation Conference in Orlando, Florida, and the 23rd Annual National Space Symposium in Colorado. All three events contained enough new and vital information about GPS, GIS, and GNSS to keep me busy writing columns for months. The hard part is to filter out what you want and need to hear now as a government or military user.

    Thanks to everyone who took time to stop by the booth to say hello, and especially thank you to those who signed up for new subscriptions.

    I also want to thank everyone who responded so positively to my first column. The mail was very encouraging and helpful. Lots of new sources for me to pursue. I promise to answer all my mail, positive or not, as quickly as I can. Just be patient, there were many of letters and emails. My editor tells me we set some kind of record for response to new publications. Certainly for response to new e-publications.

    I’ll see you right here next month.