Tag: Mount Everest

  • Peak XV: The framework that measured Mount Everest

    Peak XV: The framework that measured Mount Everest

    A ceiling fan slowly churned, stirring the hot, humid air. Outside, warm rains pelted the muddy streets as distant langurs whooped in the thick jungle mists below.

    An incessant fly caught the attention of the office’s lone occupant, hunched over a table covered with a large grid-lined sheet of paper. Pencils, erasers, French curves and straightedges lay scattered next to a stack of calculation sheets, but the man holding a pencil in one hand gripped a rolled newspaper in the other, intent on his battle with the fly.

    Suddenly, the door burst open.

    “Mr. Waugh!” the intruder exclaimed, panting as he rushed in.

    “Radhanath,” Waugh replied in surprise, looking up from his maps. “I thought you were in Calcutta, 1,600 km away.”

    “Yes, Mr. Waugh, I was, but this is too important to deliver by post.”

    “Really, Radhanath. You intrigue me,” replied Waugh. “Come out with it. Your excitement is adding to this already unbearable heat.”

    “Sir,” Radhanath tried to say calmly. “I have discovered the highest mountain in the world!”

    That conversation happened in 1852. It was the crown jewel of an effort that began 50 years earlier. Britain was on the ascent. Surveying was the mathematics of empire. India, Britain’s largest protectorate, had never been systematically mapped. The British East India Company needed to know what minerals, crops and commodities could be turned into profitable enterprises, where they were, and how to move them to ports. This depended on accurately mapping India. Infantry officer William Lambton proposed an audacious solution: measure the entire subcontinent with triangles.

    William Lambton
    William Lambton

    Lambton was granted the commission, and on April 10, 1802, the Great Trigonometrical Survey (GTS) of India began with a humble but critical baseline from St. Thomas Mount near Madras, 12 km south to Perumbauk Hill. Everything depended on the accuracy of this first baseline: even the smallest error would multiply as triangles spread across the subcontinent. Perfection was essential. The distance was measured with a 100-ft steel chain protected from the sun beneath A-frame tents to prevent thermal expansion. It moved slowly, 100 ft at a time from start to finish. Every link mattered. The baseline took 57 days.

    To guarantee perfect alignment, Lambton relied on a massive custom-built theodolite. It weighed 1,102 lbs, requiring 12 men to carry. Surveyors planted stakes, stretched strings, and used the theodolite to correct for every change in elevation, turning a simple chain measurement into the geodetic foundation of the entire survey.

    Time marched on faster than the survey. The East India Company estimated five years, but by 1818, the survey reached west to Mangalore and north to Hinganghat. It was too slow. Lambton’s vision of “an uninterrupted series of triangles…from sea to sea…to an unlimited extent in every other direction,” a complete geometric quilt covering India, proved implausible. Malaria took its toll. Lambton’s health declined and in 1823 he died at Hinganghat. George Everest inherited the survey.

    The map of triangles covered Madras to Mangalore.
    The map of triangles covered Madras to Mangalore.
    George Everest
    George Everest

    Everest recognized Lambton’s dream of total coverage would take centuries. Instead, he conceived a “gridiron” of chains running north–south and east–west, intersecting at right angles, scaffolding to which localized surveys could be tied. The shift is evident on the GTS map: dense triangulation in south-central India reflects Lambton’s ambition, while the more open, structural network elsewhere reveals Everest’s pragmatism.

    By the 1830s, Everest’s survey party had grown into slow-moving caravans, reaching as many as 1,000 people at peak times. Contemporary accounts describe columns supported by elephants, horses and camels, with hundreds of porters carrying tents, instruments and provisions. The logistics were immense: scouts rode ahead to negotiate passage with villages, reapers with scythes gathered grass for the animals, hunters supplied fresh meat and a traveling treasury paid workers and suppliers. To villagers, an approaching column appeared like a military invasion. Negotiations for assistance and safe passage could halt the survey for days.

    The survey’s path was relentless. The Great Arc bisected India along the 78th meridian, from Cape Comorin to Bangalore, across the Deccan Plateau, through Hyderabad, over the northern plains to Dehra Dun at the Himalayan foothills. They didn’t simply pass through. They stayed. Sometimes for weeks, building 50 ft masonry towers to mount the theodolites.

    When daytime heat and haze made measurements impossible, Everest shifted to night surveying using powerful lanterns visible from 30 miles away. They constantly adapted due to temperature, atmospheric refraction, verification baselines measured at the chain ends. Every measurement propagated from that first line at Madras; a minor error would compound over thousands of miles.

    The price was paid in lives. Malaria wiped out entire parties. Three officers died in the Terai, the malarial lowlands of northern India. Two more retired, health-shattered. Everest himself contracted malaria repeatedly, suffering partial paralysis. The climate, he wrote, was “very deadly.”

    Andrew Waugh
    Andrew Waugh

    The survey transformed the land. To achieve clear sight lines, villages were razed, sacred hills appropriated, and community supplies exhausted. Yet the work continued. In December 1841, almost 40 years since the GTS began, the 1,500-mile Great Arc was complete. The spine was in place. Everest retired in 1843, passing the work to Andrew Scott Waugh, who extended the gridiron eastward. Nepal and Tibet were closed to outsiders. Waugh understood the distant Himalayan peaks, more than a hundred miles away, would have to be measured from the border stations anchored to the GTS framework. Accuracy became even more critical. This shift in focus from Everest’s large sprawling triangles inching north like a spider’s web forming the Great Arc, to Waugh’s tight triangles hugging the Himalayan frontier is visible on the GTS map.

    Over the next decade, Waugh’s teams pushed eastward through the jungles of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, verifying baselines, fixing latitudes and longitudes astronomically, establishing stations that brought the peaks within mathematical reach. Along the entire border, surveyors recorded the peaks.

    Close-up of the border survey stations used to observe Peak XV. (Credit: Royal Geographical Society)
    Close-up of the border survey stations used to observe Peak XV. (Credit: Royal Geographical Society)

    To measure Peak XV, six observation stations were selected across the Terai, the deadly malarial lowlands chosen for the clear site lines to the summit. From these stations, surveyors recorded azimuth and elevation angles across multiple seasons. They measured the summit at sunrise, when the peak was first illuminated. None of the surveyors knew the height of the mountains they were observing because distance could not be measured directly. Only when all stations were plotted on a map could the peak’s position be fixed and the elevation calculated. This high-level mathematics fell to the human computers in Calcutta, led by Radhanath Sikdar.

    Radhanath Sikdar
    Radhanath Sikdar

    By 1851, Sikdar had risen to chief computer, directing the department that transformed field observations into verified measurements. The 1851 Survey Manual acknowledged his distinction: “Babu Radhanath Sickdar, the distinguished head of the Computing Department…whose intimate acquaintance with the rigorous forms and mode of procedure…render his aid particularly valuable.” Yet, neither his education nor his geodetic calculation training prepared him for the complexities of the Himalaya problem. Nonetheless, he took the raw observations and calculated the mountains’ heights to determine which, if any, of the distant peaks was truly the highest point on Earth.

    Sikdar calculated the height of each of the peaks. There were many. It was slow, meticulous work. Peak XV required more than standard calculation. Six observation stations produced six independent height measurements, each requiring corrections for atmospheric refraction (light bending through air layers of varying density and temperature), Earth’s curvature (the summit was more than 100 miles away), and plumb-line deviation (the Himalayas’ mass pulled survey instruments slightly toward the mountains).

    Sikdar applied the Method of Least Squares, a statistical technique for extracting the most probable value from multiple observations. Each station’s measurement carried uncertainty; combining all six through rigorous mathematics yielded a more reliable result.

    The calculation took months. When Sikdar finished, he was stunned: exactly 29,000 ft recalculated and received the same result. The precision seemed too perfect. Sikdar knew the stakes. This wasn’t just another mountain. His calculations were correct. Peak XV was the highest point in the world, Chomolungma, meaning the goddess mother of the Earth. Such a discovery demanded the honor of delivering the news in person.

    In April 1852, Sikdar traveled 1,600 km from Calcutta to Dehra Dun. The journey took weeks. He carried the calculations in his satchel and the announcement in his mind.

    When Sikdar burst into Waugh’s office with the news, Waugh worried that exactly 29,000 ft (8,830 m) would make surveyors appear to have simply rounded. 2 ft were added, a small fiction to preserve credibility. The official height for Peak XV became 29,002 ft.

    Waugh spent four years verifying before the official announcement in March 1856. The mathematics were sound from the moment Sikdar burst into that office. Then, 20 years later, the 1875 Survey Manual erased Sikdar’s name entirely. The British press called it “robbery of the dead.”

    Sikdar’s calculations have stood the test of time. The 1954 Survey of India measurement, 102 years later, yielded 29,028 ft, a minimal difference. In 1999, GPS technology placed a receiver on Everest’s summit for the first time: 29,035 ft. The 2015 earthquake prompted the most comprehensive measurement yet.

    On May 22, 2019, at 3 a.m., Nepali surveyor Khimlal Gautam departed Everest’s South Col for the 10-hour climb carrying 90 lbs (41kg) of equipment. The pre-dawn timing avoided crowds: the weight included a Trimble R10 GNSS receiver and ground-penetrating radar to distinguish rock height from snow depth. Eight continuously operating reference stations (CORS) were positioned across Nepal to receive signals from GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. Chinese surveyors simultaneously measured from the north.

    Gautam spent hours on the summit, collecting data while his body slowly consumed itself in the death zone. He lost a toe to frostbite. A team member nearly died from oxygen depletion. Gautam understood, “Mount Everest symbolizes something in Nepal, but it’s not only a Nepal asset, it’s a world asset.”

    The map of the Great Trigonometrical Survey. (Credit: Survey of India, via David Rumsey Collection)
    The map of the Great Trigonometrical Survey. (Credit: Survey of India, via David Rumsey Collection)

    On Dec. 8, 2020, Nepal and China jointly announced their result, agreeing for the first time the height was 29,031.69 ft. Sikdar’s error across 168 years was 31.69 ft, an accuracy of 0.11%.

    From that moment in Dehra Dun, Sikdar, dusty from the road, calculations in hand, certainty in his voice, we trace backward through 50 years of framework building to understand what made that measurement possible. Peak XV, hidden in plain view, seen for hundreds of miles, refusing to be known, was finally measured.

    Once we have measured it, we want to believe we know it, but the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates continue to collide, pushing the mountain up four millimeters per year. Earthquakes in the region change the topography. The geoid problem persists: What does “sea level” mean 440 miles from the coast in a gravitationally dense region? Modern surveyors still grapple with the fundamental question: What does “height” mean when measured against a theoretical reference surface?

    The Great Trigonometric Survey proved that surveyors could measure what they couldn’t touch, calculate what they couldn’t reach, and verify what they couldn’t see. It required building the geodetic infrastructure across a subcontinent, maintaining mathematical precision across decades, and accepting brutal human costs.

    Then, the computer was a man. The information was in his satchel. The message was delivered in person. It was the first time the height of the highest known point was determined not by a physical barometer on a summit, but by mathematics alone, a man solving equations in a room 440 miles away. Sikdar proved the impossible: What couldn’t be touched could be measured, what couldn’t be reached could be calculated, and a man dusty from the road could hold the height of the world in the palm of his hand.

    Four names for one mountain. Each represents a different understanding. Its ancient name, Chomolungma, and Sagarmatha, its national identity. Peak XV, its cartographic name marking the audacious attempt to measure it, and the name Mount Everest, the crowning achievement, a proclamation honoring mathematics, from Hipparchus who is credited with developing trigonometry to the computers, like Sikdar. It stands as a monument to all the surveying and cartography, especially of the 19th century accomplishing the impossible against extraordinary odds.

    Surveying and mapping are jobs of courage and determination exploring the unknown, risking death in malaria-infested jungles, Everest working while stricken with partial paralysis, Abdul Hamid crossing a forbidden border, and Gautam’s predawn climb. They all understood what mattered was worth the risk. It is the surveyor’s call to arms: measure the Earth.

  • Everest survey succeeds with Trimble GNSS

    Everest survey succeeds with Trimble GNSS

    The Government of Nepal has completed fieldwork for measuring Everest’s height using GNSS equipment from Trimble, including the robust R10 receiver.

    The Survey Department of the Government of Nepal has completed fieldwork for the National Initiative for the Measurement of the Height of Sagarmatha (Mount Everest). The Nepali survey team summited at 3 (local time) May 22, 2019 (by the Nepali calendar, that’s २०७६ जेठ ८, or June 8, 2076).

    The summit team of Chief Survey Officer Khim Lal Gautam and Survey Officer Rabin Karki was supported by mountain guide Tshiring Jangbu and two of his fellow Sherpas.

    The ascent was dark, windy and treacherous — the team had to make optimal use of the limited time that the hazardous conditions and their oxygen supplies afforded. The primary surveying task was to collect GNSS observations with the Trimble R10 GNSS receiver they carried.

    On the summit: Chief Officer Khim Lal Gautam, Survey Officer Rabin Karki, Sherpa Tshiring Jangbu, and the Trimble R10. (Photo: Trimble)
    On the summit: Chief Officer Khim Lal Gautam, Survey Officer Rabin Karki, Sherpa Tshiring Jangbu, and the Trimble R10. (Photo: Trimble)

    Due to the limited time window on the summit, they had essentially one shot at the GNSS observations. The R10 was configured to begin collecting observations on power-up. During training and test observations before the ascent, the R10 had proven to be exceptionally reliable, with no malfunctions.

    Compact size, light weight and durability were important factors for the receiver chosen for the summit observations. The IP67-rated R10 with internal battery weighs 1.12 kg (2.5 lb.) and operates in a temperature range of –40° C to +65° C (–40°F to +149° F). Its solid alloy housing withstands a 1-meter drop. The only concern for the team on the final ascent was to keep the battery and spares warm.

    The R10 recorded 1 hour and 16 minutes of GNSS observations. The static data (observations from GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou) was post-processed using Trimble Business Center software together with observations from eight GNSS reference stations established as an active control network for the survey. Several of the reference stations were Trimble NetR9 network receivers with Zephyr Geodetic antennas.

    The team also used a compact ground penetrating radar (GPR) instrument to determine the distance between the top of the ice/snow cap on the summit and the highest point of solid rock beneath.

    Many of the successive accepted heights for Everest have been to the top of the ice cap, which can vary seasonally by several meters. A goal of the survey is to provide heights for both aspects of the peak. An additional reason to establish a new height for Everest is to determine whether, and by how much, the 2015 earthquakes in the region altered the mountain.

    Photo: Trimble
    Photo: Trimble

    While the Nepalese survey team’s GNSS observations on the summit will yield the height, the final orthometric elevation will be achieved by applying an updated gravity model. The gravity model was refined from supporting surveys on the mountain and surrounding region.

    A total of 298 new gravity observations were performed over several years, with companion GNSS observations on each control point. More than 248 kilometers of precise leveling, supplemented with trigonometric leveling, was performed for the network of control and base receiver locations. Instruments employed for these terrestrial surveys included Trimble DiNi levels and S9 total stations.

    Trimble GPS/GNSS instruments have been to the Sagarmatha summit on multiple occasions, including in 1990, 1998, 2005 and 2012. The R10 represents the lightest and most compact of these to date.

    By prior agreement between Nepal and China, the results of the 2019 Nepali survey, and a May 2020 Chinese survey, will be jointly announced. Official results are expected this summer.


    Featured photo: A GNSS reference station network was established before the survey to provide data for post processing, and to support additional surveying and geophysical studies of the region. (Photo: Trimble)

  • Mount Everest survey complete, results still to come

    Mount Everest survey complete, results still to come

    The survey team and sherpas reach the top of the world. (Photo: CHC Navigation)
    The survey team and sherpas reach the top of the world. (Photo: CHC Navigation)

    China’s field work for new measurements of Mount Everest — the world’s, highest peak — are now complete. However, it will take two to three months for scientists to calculate and release its exact height, according to CHC Navigation, whose GNSS receiver was used.

    The eight-member Chinese survey team reached the summit on May 27. The team erected a survey marker and installed a GNSS antenna on the snow-covered peak. The team also conducted a GNSS survey, snow depth measurement and gravity survey, said China’s Ministry of Natural Resources.

    Scientists will use multiple traditional and modern measurement techniques to perform comprehensive calculations of the measurement data. After data analysis and processing, they will carry out theoretical studies and repeated verifications to determine the accurate height. Complex calculations are needed to eliminate errors caused by factors such as temperature, air pressure and the refractive environment.

  • CHC Navigation’s GNSS receivers reach Everest peak

    CHC Navigation’s GNSS receivers reach Everest peak

    CHC Navigation’s P5 geodetic GNSS receiver was successfully used by a Chinese team of surveyors to complete the 2020 Mount Everest Elevation Survey.

    This is the first time that a team of Chinese surveyors has climbed the summit of Mount Everest, and it is also the first time that BeiDou-based Chinese GNSS receivers have been used to measure the height of Mount Everest, known in China as Mount Qomolangma.

    China's National Geodetic Survey Team and its Mountaineer's Team. (Photo: CHC Navigation)
    China’s National Geodetic Survey Team and its Mountaineer’s Team used CHCNAV GNSS receivers. (Photo: CHC Navigation)

    The Everest Project

    To promote research on the Mount Everest elevation and to ensure the scientific character and accuracy of measurements, the Ministry of Natural Resources mobilized the Shaanxi Bureau of Topography and Geographic Information Mapping from the Chinese Academy of Topography and Mapping to plan and implement the measurements of the Mount Everest elevation. China’s National Geodetic Survey Team and its Mountaineer’s Team would undertake the arduous climb.

    The plan set out the technical guidelines and required that the Everest Elevation Project be designed to achieve innovative and technological breakthroughs in several areas of research.

    The first is to use the BeiDou satellite navigation system to perform GNSS measurements; the second is to use Chinese surveying and mapping equipment to complete the task.

    Meeting Harsh Challenges

    In October 2019, CHCNAV received a request from the Ministry of Natural Resources to provide GNSS equipment for the 2020 Everest Elevation Project. A dedicated team combining different departments, from R&D to manufacturing, was set up. The team elaborated the specific technical requirements from the National Survey engineers, in particular the difficulties and challenges related to the altitude of Everest.

    Measuring the height of Mount Everest, especially the summit, is a challenge, not only for the limitation of the human body in such elevation environment, but also for the performance of the GNSS receiver itself.

    At over 8,800 meters, the minimum temperature can reach -45°C and the atmospheric pressure is only 30 kPa (compared to the normal 101 kPa). All the surveying equipment used is exposed to both low temperature and low-pressure constraints.

    In addition, the operation of the instruments must be as simple and reliable as possible in such an extreme environment. Surveyors wear thick winter clothing and lack oxygen, making every movement an extreme challenge. Finally, the measurement of the mountain peak must be completed at the first attempt, as re-measurement is impossible.

    CHCNAV's P5 geodetic GNSS receiver. (Photo: CHC Navigation)
    CHCNAV’s P5 geodetic GNSS receiver. (Photo: CHC Navigation)

    Rugged Solution

    To meet these stringent requirements, CHCNAV has provided GNSS receivers that have passed the most rigorous environmental and reliability tests. The entire solution, from the GNSS receivers to the accessories, has been optimized to ensure mission success from the very beginning.

    A wide temperature range of material — supporting an operating temperature range of –45°C to +85°C — were used, including redesigned lithium-ion batteries offering 12 hours of operation even at extremely low temperatures. Also used were antenna cables with a specific compound material to avoid any cracking or signal attenuation.

    To ensure reliable operation of the receivers in a low-pressure environment, the GNSS receivers have built-in waterproof and breathable valves to maintain internal and external pressures. The low-pressure tests replicated a 25-kPa environment, corresponding to an altitude of 10,000 meters.

    Additional ruggedized reinforcement prevented damage in the event of accidental receiver drop thanks to a robust design to keep the display and connectors safe. Following CHCNAV tests, third-party organizations were commissioned to perform environmental testing and reliability verification, including storage and operating at high/low temperatures, vibration, shock, rain, dust, humid heat, salt and fog.

    From November 2019 to March 2020, CHCNAV’s GNSS equipment was supplied to the National Photoelectric Rangefinder Testing Center — under the requirements of the China Academy of Surveying and Mapping — for the most rigorous evaluation. As a result, the company’s GNSS receivers were selected to provide the peak altitude measurements of Everest in 2020.

    The climb to the summit. (Photo: CHC Navigation)
    The climb to the summit. (Photo: CHC Navigation)

    Reaching the Summit

    On April 5, 2020, at the Everest Elevation Survey Expedition Ceremony in Lhasa, CHCNAV officially donated GNSS equipment to the National Survey Team. Both product and technical training was provided to the team.

    The 53 members of the first National Survey Team overcame the difficulties related to the environment, bad weather and the additional impact of COVID-19, and conducted a series of measurements on Mount Everest and surrounding areas such as level, gravity and GNSS.

    Thirty of the 60 points of the GNSS control network were measured with CHCNAV GNSS receivers, including three of the seven Everest elevation intersection points.

    On May 27, the CHCNAV GNSS receivers finally reached the summit and successfully completed the task.

    The successful achievement of the Everest elevation measurement reflects the performance of the Chinese surveying and mapping industry, confirms BeiDou as a major part of the GNSS systems, and demonstrates the technical success of CHCNAV as a major player in the GNSS industry.

    About CHC Navigation

    Founded in 2003, CHC Navigation is a publicly listed company creating innovative GNSS navigation and positioning solutions. With a global presence across the world, distributors in more than 100 countries, and more than 1,300 employees, CHC Navigation is today recognized as one of the fastest-growing company in geomatics technologies.

  • Seen + Heard: Quantum entanglement, robot dog, reversing earthquakes

    Seen + Heard: Quantum entanglement, robot dog, reversing earthquakes

    “Seen & Heard” is a monthly feature of GPS World magazine, traveling the world to capture interesting and unusual news stories involving the GNSS/PNT industry.


    Photo: Mt. Qomolangma/miljko /E+/Getty Images
    Photo: Mt. Qomolangma/miljko /E+/Getty Images

    Chinese surveyors take BeiDou to the top

    On May 6, more than 30 Chinese surveyors left base camp to summit Mount Qomolangma — known in the west as Mount Everest. The team is using both traditional and modern surveying and mapping technologies, and China’s BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) will be applied to the elevation survey for the first time. The previous survey in 2005 used GPS to measure the height (found to be 8,844.43 meters); this year’s survey uses all four GNSS, with BDS data as the main reference.


    Image: BlackJack3D/E+/Getty Images
    Image: BlackJack3D/E+/Getty Images

    Quantum entanglement

    In a paper published April 20 in Physical Review Letters, University of Arizona engineering and optical sciences researchers, in collaboration with engineers from General Dynamics Mission Systems, demonstrate how a combination of two techniques — radio frequency photonics sensing and quantum metrology — can give sensor networks a previously unheard-of level of precision. The work involves transferring information from electrons to photons, then using quantum entanglement to increase the photons’ sensing capabilities. The quantum-sensing paradigm could create opportunities to improve GPS receivers, astronomy laboratories and biomedical imaging capabilities, as well as improve the performance of any application that requires a network of sensors.


    Photo: 2010 Chile Earthquake/erlucho/iStock/Getty Images Plus/Getty Images
    Photo: 2010 Chile Earthquake/erlucho/iStock/Getty Images Plus/Getty Images

    Earthquake reversal

    Researchers evaluating movement of GNSS ground stations have discovered large-scale, back-and-forth ground movement preceding the 2010 seaquake off of Chile and the 2011 Tohoku-oki seaquake off of Japan. Researchers from the Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam (GFZ) with collaborators from Chile and the United States say both quakes showed multiple strange reversals of ground motion — an extremely slow “wobbling” of the continental plate — over a period of five months (for Japan) and seven months (for Chile). The discovery was made possible by the amount of data collected by the GNSS stations in both countries.


    Dogbot on patrol

    A robot dog from U.S.-based Boston Dynamics reminded visitors to Bishan-Ang Mo Kio Park in Singapore to maintain social distancing due to the coronavirus pandemic, reported the BBC in May. The dogbot is fitted with lidar to monitor how busy the park becomes. It also carried a loudspeaker to broadcast social-distancing messages.

  • Nepali survey team collects Everest height data

    The survey team set up the base station in Everest base camp. (Photo: Tshiring Jangbu Sherpa via Nepal24hours.com)
    The survey team set up the base station in Everest base camp. (Photo: Tshiring Jangbu Sherpa via Nepal24hours.com)

    A Nepali survey team made a successful ascent of Mount Everest to measure its official height.

    This is the first height survey conducted by the government of Nepal. The precise height of Mount Everest — now listed as 29,029 feet, or 8,848 meters — has been contested since the first survey by British officers in 1849.

    Nepal plans to end the controversy and declare both snow and rock height of the world’s tallest mountain.

    Chief Survey Officer Khimlal Gautam and surveyor Rabin Karki reached the peak of Mt. Everest on May 22 at 3 a.m. local time and collected data from a Trimble R10 GNSS receiver gifted from New Zealand.

    The surveyors stayed atop the peak for about 1 hour, 16 minutes, according to Nepal24hours.com.

    The final result of the official height measurement of Mt.Everest is expected within the next six months.

    “To make the observation of data on GNSS we spent one hour and 16 minutes in the summit which was a very challenging and trying time for us,” Gautam said. “We faced extreme difficulty mainly while descending from the summit.”

    According to Tshering Janbu Sherpa, guide leader of the survey team, the team faced difficulties because of the exhaustion of oxygen of one member, who was rescued during the descent.

    Besides a GNSS survey at the summit, teams conducted precise leveling, trigonometric leveling and gravity surveys. The GNSS survey will cover 285 points with 12 different observation stations, nine of which are in hills of Sankhuwasava, Bhojpur and Solukhumbu districts.

  • Seen & Heard: Measuring Everest, GPS Rollover boo-boos

    Seen & Heard: Measuring Everest, GPS Rollover boo-boos

    Seen & Heard is a monthly feature of GPS World magazine, traveling the world to capture interesting and unusual news stories involving the GPS/GNSS industry.

    Photo: Mount Everest/Daniel Prudek/Shutterstock.com
    Photo: Mount Everest/Daniel Prudek/Shutterstock.com

    Surveying the highest height

    The precise height of Mount Everest — now listed as 29,029 feet, or 8,848 meters — has been contested since the first survey by British officers in 1849.

    On January 2020, Nepal plans to end the controversy and declare both snow and rock height of the world’s tallest mountain. This spring a two-member Nepali survey team will summit the mountain with a Trimble R10 GNSS receiver, gifted by New Zealand.

    Besides a GNSS survey at the summit, teams will conduct precise leveling, trigonometric leveling and gravity surveys. The GNSS survey will cover 285 points with 12 different observation stations, nine of which are in hills of Sankhuwasava, Bhojpur and Solukhumbu districts.

    Photo: e-Golf cars/Volkswagen
    Photo: e-Golf cars/Volkswagen

    Takin’ it to the (Hamburg) streets

    Five electric Volkswagen Golfs are now on the streets of Hamburg, Germany, being tested with Level 4 automation.

    The cars are designed to handle complex urban traffic patterns without help from drivers, although they must be ready to intervene.

    Level 5, the highest category, requires the vehicle to perform all tasks, turning every rider into a passenger.

    The cars are driving 1.9 miles (3 km) of urban roads where new signals and traffic management systems have been installed for autonomous driving.

    Boeing 787 Dreamliner Hainan airlines/aapsky/Shutterstock.com
    Boeing 787 Dreamliner Hainan airlines/aapsky/Shutterstock.com

    GPS Rollover gone wrong

    The April 6 GPS Week Number Rollover was supposed to pass without a hitch, with plenty of notice that updates might be required for legacy receivers. Instead, several systems crashed.

    In China, as many as 15 Boeing 777s and 787s were grounded pending a GPS update (the receivers gave the date as August 22, 1999.)

    In New York City, part of the wireless grid faulted, cutting information feeds to the NYPD (license plate cameras) and remote worksite communications.

    In Australia, weather balloons were grounded. In the United States, NOAA autonomous monitoring stations went offline. Fixes for all these systems are underway.